HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sanelli, P. C. Articles by Zimmerman, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sanelli, P. C. Articles by Zimmerman, R. D. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Reproducibility of Postprocessing of Quantitative CT Perfusion Maps

¹ Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 520 E 70th St., Starr 630, New York, NY 10021.
² Department of Neurology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess interobserver and intraobserver variability in evaluation of the reproducibility of quantitative data obtained in semiautomated postprocessing of CT perfusion data sets by observers of different levels of skill and experience and in fully automated postprocessing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty CT perfusion data sets were postprocessed by a neuroradiologist using an automated postprocessing program and by five observers (neuroradiology attending, neurology attending, radiology resident, senior and junior CT technologists) who received a brief training session in use of software for semiautomated postprocessing. For assessment of intraobserver variability, each observer repeated postprocessing of 10 CT perfusion data sets. Standard regions of interest were placed on identical locations for each observer's cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) maps of three brain regions: an ischemia-infarct region, normal cortical gray matter, and white matter.

RESULTS. The variability in mean quantitative values of CBF, CBV, and MTT was 2.5-9.5% among all observers. Greater variability (20.4%) was introduced with the automated program. High correlation was found among all possible pairings of observers (r = 0.87-0.99). Low correlation was observed between automated postprocessing and postprocessing by all observers. Intraobserver variability in quantitative CT perfusion data ranged from 0.29% to 10.8%. High intraobserver correlation (r = 0.91-0.99) was found for the observers.

CONCLUSION. Quantitative CBF, CBV, and MTT data obtained from postprocessing of CT perfusion data sets are reproducible among observers with varying levels of skill and experience. Observer interaction with the software is an important component for correct identification of user-defined parameters. Establishing a uniform and standard postprocessing technique is essential for maintaining good reproducibility.

Keywords: brain • cerebrovascular disease • CT • perfusion CT

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Wang, N. Wu, M. D. Cham, and Y. Song Tumor Response in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Perfusion CT Evaluation of Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2009; 193(4): 1090 - 1096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.S. Vagal, J.L. Leach, M. Fernandez-Ulloa, and M. Zuccarello The Acetazolamide Challenge: Techniques and Applications in the Evaluation of Chronic Cerebral Ischemia AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2009; 30(5): 876 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. d'Assignies, A. Couvelard, S. Bahrami, M.-P. Vullierme, P. Hammel, O. Hentic, A. Sauvanet, P. Bedossa, P. Ruszniewski, and V. Vilgrain Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors: Tumor Blood Flow Assessed with Perfusion CT Reflects Angiogenesis and Correlates with Prognostic Factors Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 407 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Goh, S. Halligan, A. Gharpuray, D. Wellsted, J. Sundin, and C. I. Bartram Quantitative Assessment of Colorectal Cancer Tumor Vascular Parameters by Using Perfusion CT: Influence of Tumor Region of Interest Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 726 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.C. Sanelli, G. Nicola, R. Johnson, A.J. Tsiouris, I. Ougorets, C. Knight, B. Frommer, S. Veronelli, and R.D. Zimmerman Effect of Training and Experience on Qualitative and Quantitative CT Perfusion Data AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 428 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]