AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kono, R.
Right arrow Articles by Takamori, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kono, R.
Right arrow Articles by Takamori, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1446
AJR 2007; 188:26-36
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Dynamic MRI of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison of Enhancement Patterns of Malignant and Benign Small Peripheral Lung Lesions

Rei Kono1, Kiminori Fujimoto1, Hiroshi Terasaki1, Nestor L. Müller2, Seiya Kato3, Junko Sadohara1, Naofumi Hayabuchi1 and Shinzo Takamori4

1 Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
3 Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
4 Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI enhancement characteristics of malignant and benign solitary pulmonary nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The characteristics of 202 solitary pulmonary nodules (diameter, 1-3 cm; 144 cases of primary lung cancer, 31 cases of focal organizing pneumonia, 15 tuberculomas, 12 hamartomas) were reviewed retrospectively. In all cases dynamic MR images were obtained before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 minutes after bolus injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Maximum enhancement ratio, time at maximum enhancement ratio, slope of time-enhancement ratio curves, and washout ratio were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction, chi-square test, and receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS. For 122 (85%) of 144 primary lung cancers, time at maximum enhancement ratio was 4 minutes or less. For all tuberculomas and hamartomas, time at maximum enhancement ratio was greater than 4 minutes or gradual enhancement occurred without a peak time (p < 0.0001). Lung cancers had different maximum enhancement ratios and slopes than benign lesions (all p < 0.005). With 110% or lower maximum enhancement ratio as a cutoff value, the positive predictive value for malignancy was 92%; sensitivity, 63%; and specificity, 74%. With 13.5%/min or greater slope as a cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for malignancy were 94%, 96%, 99%, and 74%, respectively.

CONCLUSION. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is helpful in differentiating benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. Absence of significant enhancement is a strong predictor that a lesion is benign.

Keywords: chest • dynamic MRI • infectious disease • lung disease • oncologic imaging


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Girvin and J. P. Ko
Pulmonary Nodules: Detection, Assessment, and CAD
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1057 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.