AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bansmann, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Adam, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bansmann, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Adam, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0266
AJR 2007; 188:70-74
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Technical Innovation

MRI of the Coronary Vessel Wall at 3 T: Comparison of Radial and Cartesian k-Space Sampling

Paul M. Bansmann1, Andrew N. Priest2, Kai Muellerleile3, Alexander Stork1, Gunnar K. Lund4, Michael G. Kaul1 and Gerhard Adam1

1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Center of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
2 Department of Medical Physics, Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
3 Department of Cardiology/Angiology, Center of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
4 Roentgeninstitut, 40476 Duesseldorf, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare the quality of 3D gradient-echo images obtained using radial versus cartesian k-space sampling at 3 T.

CONCLUSION. This study shows that the quality of coronary vessel wall imaging of the right coronary artery with radial k-space sampling in 3D turbo field-echo sequences is superior to cartesian k-space sampling at 3 T. Radial k-space sampling at 3 T makes it possible to combine low motion artifact susceptibility with high signal-to-noise ratio.

Keywords: cardiac imaging • cardiovascular imaging • coronary vessels • heart • MR angiography • MRI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson
The Year in Cardiac Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2007; 50(10): 988 - 1003.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.