HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, T. R. C. Articles by Becker, C. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnson, T. R. C. Articles by Becker, C. R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

ECG-Gated 64-MDCT Angiography in the Differential Diagnosis of Acute Chest Pain

¹ Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Munich, Grosshadern Campus, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
² Department of Cardiology, Medical Clinic I, University of Munich, Grosshadern Campus, 81377 Munich, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The most important differential diagnoses of acute chest pain include myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of an ECG-gated 64-MDCT angiography protocol for simultaneous assessment of the pulmonary arteries, coronary arteries, and aorta within a single breath-hold.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In 55 patients with acute chest pain, ECG-gated CT angiography was performed with a CT system in which 64 slices per gantry rotation were acquired. Density measurement and visual assessment of motion artifacts were performed to evaluate image quality. CT findings were correlated with results of laboratory tests and clinical follow-up. For 20 patients, two independent blinded reviewers compared findings on CT angiography with those on X-ray coronary angiography.

RESULTS. Adequate contrast enhancement of the pulmonary vessels, coronary arteries, and aorta was achieved in all cases. Regarding image quality of the coronary arteries, there was minor blurring in seven patients, and in one examination the images did not provide enough information for diagnosis. The average image quality rating was 1.2 on a scale in which 1 indicated no artifacts; 2, minor motion artifacts; and 3, image insufficient for diagnosis. The cause of chest pain was correctly identified with MDCT in 37 patients. The diagnoses included pulmonary embolism (n = 10), coronary stenosis (n = 9), and aortic dissection (n = 1). In four patients, additional diagnoses were found with other examinations.

CONCLUSION. With current techniques, ECG-gated CT angiography of the entire chest has very good image quality. The protocol proved helpful in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain.

Keywords: aorta • cardiopulmonary imaging • CT coronary arteriography • embolism • emergency radiology

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Dodd, S. Kalva, A. Pena, F. Bamberg, M. D. Shapiro, S. Abbara, R. C. Cury, T. J. Brady, and U. Hoffmann Emergency Cardiac CT for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Coronary, Pulmonary, and Aortic Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 870 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W T Roberts, J J Bax, and L C Davies Cardiac CT and CT coronary angiography: technology and application Heart, June 1, 2008; 94(6): 781 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. M. Jolobe Excluding Pulmonary Embolism With Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography or Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scanning JAMA, April 9, 2008; 299(14): 1664 - 1664. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Colletti Cardiac Imaging: Radiologists Prepare, Participate, and Publish Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1271 - 1271. [Full Text] [PDF]