AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Branstetter, B. F., IV
Right arrow Articles by Schumann, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.2139
AJR 2007; 188:W9-W14
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Preclinical Medical Student Training in Radiology: The Effect of Early Exposure

Barton F. Branstetter, IV1,2, Laura E. Faix1, Allen L. Humphrey3 and John B. Schumann3

1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Lothrop St., PUH Rm. D132, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
2 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
3 Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an integrated radiology curriculum in the first year of medical school changes medical students' attitudes toward radiology or affects their knowledge of radiologic principles.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The first-year medical curriculum of a medical school was revised between the 2003 and 2004 academic years to introduce more didactic radiology teaching. Dedicated radiology lectures were introduced, and radiology consult sessions became integral to problem-based learning sessions. A survey was administered between the first and second years of training to assess first-year medical students' attitudes toward radiology and their knowledge of basic radiologic principles. Students who had undertaken the revised curriculum (class of 2008) were compared with students who had undertaken the traditional curriculum (class of 2007). Survey responses were compared with Mann-Whitney rank sum tests.

RESULTS. Students exposed to the new curriculum stated that they were more familiar with radiology as a specialty and believed that radiology had greater importance to the overall practice of medicine. They stated that they were more likely to select radiology as a clinical elective, and more of them were considering radiology as a career option. The students who had been exposed to radiology performed better on the test of basic radiologic knowledge. All results were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION. Exposing students to radiology in the first year of medical school improves their impression of radiology as a specialty and increases their interest in radiology as a career. Follow-up surveys will determine whether this effect persists through the clinical years of training and improves the overall impression of radiology within the medical community.

Keywords: medical student education • patient-based learning • radiology education


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.