|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
1 All authors: Gastroenterology Division of Internal Medicine, Kitasato University East Hospital, 2-1-1 Asamizodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 228-8520, Japan.
OBJECTIVE. To identify the determinants of tumor progression, we examined the ablation zones and patterns of local progression of small single primary hepatocellular carcinomas after radiofrequency ablation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty-five patients with single primary hepatocellular carcinoma less than 3 cm in diameter underwent complete tumor ablation. Clinical and biochemical features, tumor characteristics, tumor location within 5 mm from intrahepatic vessels, needle biopsy before treatment, and presence of ablative margin of 5 mm or more were statistically analyzed as determinants of local tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox model were used for the analyses. Patterns of local tumor progression were examined by image analysis.
RESULTS. During a median observation period of 30.3 months, 14 (16.5%) of the 85 patients had local tumor progression. The results of the log-rank test showed that the presence of vessels contiguous with the tumor (p = 0.0292) and the absence of an ablative margin of at least 5 mm (p = 0.019) significantly correlated with local tumor progression. Cox regression analysis showed that the absence of an ablative margin of at least 5 mm was an independent factor (p = 0.04). The most common pattern of local tumor progression was a single viable outgrowth from the side of the ablated area when the ablative margin was less than 5 mm. Multiple viable outgrowths were observed in one case despite the presence of an ablative margin greater than 5 mm.
CONCLUSION. An ablation zone with an ablative margin of 5 mm or greater was the most important factor for local control of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Keywords: abdominal imaging cancer hepatocellular carcinoma liver disease radiofrequency ablation
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Shibata, H. Isoda, Y. Hirokawa, S. Arizono, K. Shimada, and K. Togashi Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Is Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization More Effective than Radiofrequency Ablation Alone for Treatment? Radiology, June 30, 2009; (2009) 2523081676. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mori, K. Fukuda, H. Asaoka, T. Ueda, A. Kunimatsu, Y. Okamoto, K. Nasu, K. Fukunaga, Y. Morishita, and M. Minami Radiofrequency Ablation of the Liver: Determination of Ablative Margin at MR Imaging with Impaired Clearance of Ferucarbotran--Feasibility Study Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 557 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Kei, H. Rhim, D. Choi, W. J. Lee, H. K. Lim, and Y.-s. Kim Local Tumor Progression After Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors: Analysis of Morphologic Pattern and Site of Recurrence Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1544 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Arellano Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 390 - 392. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |