|
|
||||||||
Original Research |
1 Department of Radiology, UH B1D407, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann
Arbor, MI.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, 300
Pasteur Dr., H1307, Stanford, CA 94305-5105.
3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak,
MI.
4 Department of Surgery-Urology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor,
MI.
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine the accuracy of imaging-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy and its impact on clinical management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. With institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed imaging-guided renal biopsies performed by radiologists at our institution between February 1999 and July 2005. Patient records, pathology reports, and imaging studies were reviewed. Concordance of biopsy diagnosis and follow-up data was assessed. Significant impact on clinical management was determined in collaboration with two experienced urologists and was defined as a change from no therapy to therapy, including surgery, tumor ablation, chemotherapy, or radiation.
RESULTS. Two hundred seventy-six renal biopsies were performed during the study period. Of these, 123 were random biopsies and fine-needle technique was used for one; these 124 were excluded. One hundred fifty-two renal mass biopsies were performed using coaxial 18-gauge core needle technique in 125 patients (55 women, 70 men; average age, 60 years; range, 28-90 years). There were two (1.3%) postprocedural hematomas (one [0.7%] requiring blood transfusion) and one (0.7%) delayed renal pseudoaneurysm attributed to biopsy. No tumor seeding was identified. In 85 biopsies (56%), malignant neoplasm was found, 61 biopsies (40%) yielded benign findings, and six (4%) were nondiagnostic. The sensitivity for malignancy was 97.7%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; and negative predictive value, 100%. At least 92 (60.5%) biopsy results significantly impacted clinical management.
CONCLUSION. Imaging-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of renal masses is safe and highly accurate. Tissue diagnosis alters clinical decision making in a majority of the cases and may allow a number of unnecessary nephrectomies to be avoided.
Keywords: core biopsy kidney renal disease renal mass
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A O'Keeffe, S. McNally, and M. T Keogan Investigating painless haematuria BMJ, July 9, 2008; 337(jul09_3): a260 - a260. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Prasad, V. R. Surabhi, C. O. Menias, A. A. Raut, and K. N. Chintapalli Benign Renal Neoplasms in Adults: Cross-Sectional Imaging Findings Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 158 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tombesi, M. Catellani, and S. Sartori Renal Mass Core Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): W168 - W168. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |