HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wiggins, M. C. Articles by Gilula, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wiggins, M. C. Articles by Gilula, L. A. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Importance of Intravertebral Fracture Clefts in Vertebroplasty Outcome

¹ All authors: Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd., Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110.
² Present address: Lancaster Radiology Associates, Lancaster, PA.
³ Present address: Advanced Diagnostic Imaging, Belleville, IL.

OBJECTIVE. The importance of filling intravertebral fracture clefts with polymethylmethacrylate during percutaneous vertebroplasty to maximize stabilization of fracture fragments has been emphasized in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with a single compression fracture with an intravertebral cleft have better outcome after percutaneous vertebroplasty than do patients with a compression fracture but no cleft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective study was conducted to review 354 consecutive percutaneous vertebroplasty procedures on 694 compression fractures. Patients were excluded from consideration if they were treated for metastatic compression fracture or if they were treated at more than a single vertebral body level. Sixty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Preprocedure radiographs and MR images were reviewed with specific attention to the presence or absence of intravertebral gas or fluid. Images obtained at the procedure also were reviewed for the presence or absence of an intravertebral cleft. Imaging findings were correlated with subjective pain scores immediately, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the procedure.

RESULTS. Thirty-one (48%) of the 65 patients had evidence of a fracture cleft. Twenty-seven patients had opacification of an intravertebral fracture cleft at percutaneous vertebroplasty, and four patients had an intravertebral cleft on preprocedure imaging but did not have cleft opacification. Thirty-four (52%) of the patients had no evidence of a fracture cleft and had only a trabecular pattern of opacification. Although there was a trend toward a greater failure rate in patients with a filled cleft, there was no statistically significant difference in subjective pain scores between the groups.

CONCLUSION. Pain relief with vertebroplasty is similar in patients with and those without intravertebral fracture clefts. Because of the small number of unfilled fracture clefts in our population, the true incidence of post-percutaneous vertebroplasty pain in patients with an un-filled cleft remains uncertain.

Keywords: interventional radiology • spine • vertebroplasty

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Tanigawa, S. Kariya, A. Komemushi, T. Tokuda, M. Nakatani, R. Yagi, and S. Sawada Cement Leakage in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Compression Fractures With or Without Intravertebral Clefts Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): W442 - W445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Rad, L.A. Gray, and D.F. Kallmes Significance and Targeting of Small, Central Clefts in Severe Fractures Treated With Vertebroplasty AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1285 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]