AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porter, G. J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chakrabarti, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Porter, G. J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chakrabarti, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.05.1950
AJR 2007; 188:676-683
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Influence of Mammographic Parenchymal Pattern in Screening-Detected and Interval Invasive Breast Cancers on Pathologic Features, Mammographic Features, and Patient Survival

Gareth J. R. Porter1, Andrew J. Evans, Eleanor J. Cornford, Helen C. Burrell, Jonathan J. James, Andrew H. S. Lee and Jayeta Chakrabarti

1 All authors: Nottingham Breast Institute, City Hospital, Hucknall Rd., Nottingham, England, NG5 1PB.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of mammographic parenchymal pattern on patient survival, mammographic features, and pathologic features of breast cancer in a screened population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We classified the parenchymal pattern (according to BI-RADS) of 759 screened women who presented with a screening-detected (n = 455) or interval (n = 304) invasive breast cancer. Pathologic details (tumor size, histologic grade, lymph node stage, vascular invasion, and histologic type) and mammographic appearances were recorded. Breast cancer-specific survival was ascertained, with a median follow-up of 9.0 years.

RESULTS. An excess of interval cancers was seen in women with dense breasts (p < 0.0001). Screening-detected (but not interval) tumors were significantly smaller in fatty breasts (p = 0.014). Tumor grade, lymph node stage, vascular invasion, and histologic type did not vary significantly with mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected or interval cancers. Screening-detected cancers in fatty breasts were more likely to appear as indistinct (p = 0.003) or spiculated (p = 0.002) masses in contrast to cancers in dense breasts, which more commonly appeared as architectural distortions (p < 0.0001). No significant breast cancer-specific survival difference was seen by mammographic parenchymal pattern for screening-detected cancers (p = 0.75), interval cancers (p = 0.82), or both groups combined (p =0.12).

CONCLUSION. The prognosis of screened women presenting with breast cancer is unrelated to dense mammographic parenchymal pattern despite an excess of interval cancers and larger screening-detected tumors in this group. These data support the mammographic screening of women with dense parenchymal patterns.

Keywords: breast cancer • mammography • screening


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. Ghosh, K. R. Brandt, T. A. Sellers, C. Reynolds, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, M. J. Carston, V. S. Pankratz, and C. M. Vachon
Association of Mammographic Density with the Pathology of Subsequent Breast Cancer among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 872 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.