AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohrs, O. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kauczor, H.-U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohrs, O. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kauczor, H.-U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0489
AJR 2007; 188:844-849
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Before and After Transcatheter Occlusion of Patent Foramen Ovale

Oliver K. Mohrs1,2, Steffen E. Petersen3, Damir Erkapic4, Anja Victor5, Thomas Schlosser6, Bernd Nowak7, Guenter Kauffmann8, Thomas Voigtlaender7 and Hans-Ulrich Kauczor2

1 Darmstadt Radiology, Department of Cardiovascular Imaging at Alice-Hospital, Dieburger Strasse 29-31, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
2 German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
3 Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
4 Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim D-61231, Germany.
5 Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Mainz D-55101, Germany.
6 Department of Radiology, University of Essen, Essen D-45122, Germany.
7 Cardiovascular Center Bethanien, Frankfurt/Main D-60389, Germany.
8 Department of Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was threefold: to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI compared with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the detection of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and of residual shunts after occlusion of PFO, to define cutoff values for semiquantitative analysis of signal intensity-time curves, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of visual detection with that of semiquantitative analysis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-three patients (18 women, 25 men; mean age, 51 ± 14 years) who underwent TEE for suspicion of PFO (n = 26, 19 patients with and seven without PFO) or for routine assessment for residual shunt after transcatheter PFO occlusion (n = 17, nine patients with and eight without residual shunt) were consecutively enrolled to undergo contrast-enhanced MRI (saturation recovery steady-state free precession sequence). The images were analyzed both visually and semiquantitatively for arrival of contrast agent in the left atrium before arrival in the pulmonary veins during a Valsalva maneuver. TEE results were used as the clinical reference.

RESULTS. With an area under the signal intensity-time curve of 0.85, height of the first initial peak in signal intensity in the left atrium proved to be the best discriminator in right-to-left shunt detection. For a cutoff value of 129% (from baseline signal intensity) for this parameter, sensitivity and specificity were 90% (17/19) and 100% (7/7) in patients without PFO devices and 56% (5/9) and 88% (7/8) in patients with PFO devices. The diagnostic accuracy of both visual assessment and semiquantitative analysis was consistently superior before PFO device implantation than after device implantation. The diagnostic accuracy of visual shunt assessment was better than that of semiquantitative shunt assessment in patients with PFO occluders (sensitivity, 67% [6/9] correctly diagnosed; specificity, 88% [7/8]) and those without PFO occluders (sensitivity, 95% [18/19]; specificity, 100% [7/7]).

CONCLUSION. At present, MRI cannot replace TEE for the exclusion of potential embolic sources, such as thrombus in the left atrial appendage. However, MRI can be an attractive alternative noninvasive technique if TEE is technically unfeasible or is declined by patients.

Keywords: cardiac imaging • cardiovascular imaging • congenital anomaly • dynamic MRI • MRI • patent foramen ovale


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
M. Remy-Jardin and J. Remy
Vascular Disease in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Proceedings of the ATS, December 15, 2008; 5(9): 891 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M.-P. Revel, J.-B. Faivre, T. Letourneau, H. Henon, D. Leys, V. Delannoy-Deken, M. Remy-Jardin, and J. Remy
Patent Foramen Ovale: Detection with Nongated Multidetector CT
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 338 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.