HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Andreisek, G. Articles by Weishaupt, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Andreisek, G. Articles by Weishaupt, D. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

MR Arthrography of the Shoulder, Hip, and Wrist: Evaluation of Contrast Dynamics and Image Quality with Increasing Injection-to-Imaging Time

¹ Institute for Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
² Department of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland.
³ Guerbet AG, Zurich, Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to investigate the contrast dynamics and the relationship between visualization of intraarticular structures and time elapsed between intraarticular injection of contrast agent and MRI in symptomatic patients referred for MR arthrography of the shoulder, hip, and wrist.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Our local ethics committees and the national drug administration approved this multicentric study. We prospectively studied 11 shoulders, 11 hips, and 10 wrists. After the intraarticular gadolinium injection, patients underwent a baseline MR arthrography protocol (time point [TP] 1) and subsequent MRI at another four time points (TP 2-TP 5) up to 240 minutes. The course of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) over time was calculated. Three observers assessed the degree of visualization of different intraarticular structures and the overall image quality at each time point using a 3-point scale and a 5-point scale, respectively.

RESULTS. For all joints, CNR measurements showed peak CNR at TP 1 (21 minutes) and TP 2 (45 minutes) with a subsequent, near-logarithmic decline of CNR values over time. Visualization of different anatomic structures decreased over time. Overall image quality was insufficient for diagnostic purposes at TP 3 (96 minutes) in three (27%) of 11 shoulders and in three (27%) of 11 hips. In two (20%) of 10 wrists, image quality was insufficient at TP 2 (45 minutes).

CONCLUSION. For MR arthrography, the degree of visualization of intraarticular structures depends on the time elapsed between contrast injection and MRI. MR arthrography of the shoulder and hip should be performed within 90 minutes, and MR arthrography of the wrist should be performed within 45 minutes, after intraarticular injection.

Keywords: arthrography • hip • MR • musculoskeletal imaging • shoulder • wrist

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Saupe, M. Zanetti, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, T. Wels, C. Schwenke, and J. Hodler Pain and Other Side Effects after MR Arthrography: Prospective Evaluation in 1085 Patients Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 830 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Andreisek, J. M. Froehlich, J. Hodler, D. Weishaupt, V. Beutler, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, C. Boesch, and D. Nanz Direct MR Arthrography at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Signal Dependence on Gadolinium and Iodine Concentrations--Phantom Study Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 706 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]