AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fielding, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pisano, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fielding, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Pisano, E. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0539
AJR 2007; 188:897-900
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Choosing a Specialty in Medicine: Female Medical Students and Radiology

Julia R. Fielding1, Nancy M. Major2, Brian F. Mullan3, Janet A. Neutze4, Kitt Shaffer5,6, Claire B. Wilcox1, Lauren Paynter7 and Etta D. Pisano1

1 Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Dr., Campus Box 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
2 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
3 Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
4 Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA.
5 Department of Radiology, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
6 Present address: Department of Radiology, Cambridge Hospital, Cambridge, MA.
7 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are identifiable factors that dissuade female medical students from entering the field of radiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. An anonymous survey was completed by medical students at the end of their third- or fourth-year radiology clinical clerkships at five institutions. In addition to demographic data and residency choice, respondents ranked 10 factors in order of importance to their choice of career. For respondents who did not consider radiology a possible career, a second set of eight factors was ranked for importance in dissuading them.

RESULTS. Two hundred eighty-eight respondents completed the survey, 152 (53%) men and 136 (47%) women. Both men and women reported direct patient contact and intellectual stimulation as the most important factors in deciding on a specialty. For those who chose radiology, intellectual stimulation and use of emerging technology were significantly (p < 0.05) more important than other factors. The factor that most strongly (96%) dissuaded men and women from a career in radiology was lack of direct patient contact. There was no significant difference between men and women in ranking factors that dissuaded them from applying to radiology residencies; however, nearly one third of the female respondents cited competitiveness of the residency process as important.

CONCLUSION. Patient contact remains an important factor for medical students choosing a career. To attract high-caliber students, medical schools should expose students to areas of radiology involving patient interaction. Academically qualified women should be identified early during their careers and encouraged to apply for radiology residencies.

Keywords: education • radiology education • radiology practice


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.