HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eikefjord, E. N. Articles by Rørvik, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Eikefjord, E. N. Articles by Rørvik, J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Comparison of Effective Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Unenhanced MDCT and Excretory Urography for Acute Flank Pain

¹ Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, Bergen 5053, Norway.
² University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
³ Section for Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the effective radiation dose in patients undergoing unenhanced MDCT and excretory urography for acute flank pain, and to explore technical and practical factors affecting the effective dose.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred nineteen patients with acute flank pain were included. All patients were examined using both MDCT and excretory urography. CT involved one acquisition from the upper kidney margin to the symphysis pubis. The only protocol variation was in the tube current (mAs), which was made according to patient body mass. The excretory urography protocol consisted of three images, with more when supplementary images were needed. Effective radiation doses were computer-simulated using dosimetry programs for CT and conventional radiography, based on Norwegian Radiological Protection Board dose data sets. Mean and SDs of measured patient doses were calculated and compared. Further analyses of dose variations in body mass categories (body mass index) were conducted, as were analyses concerning the number of images taken.

RESULTS. The mean effective doses were 7.7 mSv with MDCT and 3.63 mSv with excretory urography. The effective dose varied both in and between techniques but could be predicted. Radiation risk decreased significantly with increased patient weight.

CONCLUSION. The average effective dose with MDCT was more than double that with excretory urography. However, the appropriate dose could be strongly predicted by the patient's body mass index and by procedure. An optimum low-dose protocol should be considered before initiating unenhanced MDCT for ureteral colic in order to minimize the radiation-induced cancer risk and to secure adequate image quality.

Keywords: dosimetry • excretory urography • MDCT • radiation dose • radiography • urinary tract

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, Y. Funama, T. Nakaura, T. Hirai, S. Roux, and Y. Yamashita Low-Dose MDCT Urography: Feasibility Study of Low-Tube-Voltage Technique and Adaptive Noise Reduction Filter Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): W220 - W229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. K. Paulson, C. Weaver, L. M. Ho, L. Martin, J. Li, J. Darsie, and D. P. Frush Conventional and Reduced Radiation Dose of 16-MDCT for Detection of Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 151 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]