AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moser, T.
Right arrow Articles by Dietemann, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moser, T.
Right arrow Articles by Dietemann, J.-L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0288
AJR 2007; 188:1278-1286
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Wrist Ligament Tears: Evaluation of MRI and Combined MDCT and MR Arthrography

Thomas Moser1, Jean-Claude Dosch, Akli Moussaoui and Jean-Louis Dietemann

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, CHU Strasbourg, Ave. Molière, Strasbourg, France 67000.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of MRI and a combination of MDCT arthrography and MR arthrography in the diagnosis of tears and cartilage abnormalities of the wrist ligaments.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The feasibility of combining MDCT arthrography and MR arthrography and performing them with an optimized contrast solution was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Forty-five consecutively enrolled subjects with suspected wrist ligament tears underwent MRI and a combined MDCT and MR arthrographic procedure. Two observers reviewed the images for evidence of tears and cartilage abnormalities of the scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments and triangular fibrocartilaginous complex. Interobserver agreement was determined with kappa statistics, and the diagnostic accuracy of each technique was calculated.

RESULTS. A 1:1 solution of 2.5 mmol/L tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid (DOTA)-gadolinium and 300 mg I/mL iopamidol provided adequate contrast enhancement for both in vitro and in vivo MDCT arthrographic and MR arthrographic images. Interobserver agreement was substantial for MRI ({kappa} = 0.61) and MR arthrography ({kappa} = 0.71) and almost perfect for MDCT arthrography ({kappa} = 0.93). The sensitivity and specificity of MRI, MDCT arthrography, and MR arthrography for tears of the scapholunate ligament were 59% and 70%, 95% and 96%, and 68% and 87% for the first observer and 77% and 83%, 95% and 100%, and 77% and 87% for the second observer. For tears of the lunotriquetral ligament, these values were 30% and 94%, 100% and 94%, and 60% and 97% for the first observer and 50% and 97%, 90% and 100%, and 50% and 94% for the second observer. The three techniques appeared equivalent for complete tears of the scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments, but partial tears were significantly better visualized with MDCT arthrography. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI, MDCT arthrography, and MR arthrography for triangular fibrocartilaginous complex tears were 27% and 100%, 100% and 100%, and 82% and 100% for the first observer and 45% and 100%, 100% and 100%, and 82% and 100% for the second observer. For cartilage abnormalities, these values were 30% and 100%, 100% and 100%, and 30% and 100% for the first observer and 10% and 100%, 100% and 100%, and 40% and 100% for the second observer.

CONCLUSION. MDCT arthrography appears more accurate than MRI and MR arthrography, particularly for discerning partial tears of the scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments that do not necessitate surgical therapy.

Keywords: arthrography • CT • joint • MRI • wrist


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. D. Crema, M. D. Marra, A. Guermazi, F. W. Roemer, K. Bohndorf, and N. Jomaah
MDCT Arthrography Features of Ulnocarpal Impaction Syndrome
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): 1376 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Moser, E. Cardinal, and J.-C. Dosch
Partial Versus Partial-Thickness Tears of the Scapholunate and Lunatotriquetral Ligaments
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): W469 - W469.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Magee
Comparison of 3-T MRI and Arthroscopy of Intrinsic Wrist Ligament and TFCC Tears
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 80 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
T. Moser, J.-C. Dosch, A. Moussaoui, X. Buy, A. Gangi, and J.-L. Dietemann
Multidetector CT Arthrography of the Wrist Joint: How to Do It
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 787 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. S. Taljanovic, J. E. Sheppard, M. D. Jones, D. N. Switlick, T. B. Hunter, and L. F. Rogers
Sonography and Sonoarthrography of the Scapholunate and Lunotriquetral Ligaments and Triangular Fibrocartilage Disk: Initial Experience and Correlation With Arthrography and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2008; 27(2): 179 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.