AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moteki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Horikoshi, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moteki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Horikoshi, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.1180
AJR 2007; 188:1313-1319
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

New CT Criterion for Acute Appendicitis: Maximum Depth of Intraluminal Appendiceal Fluid

Takao Moteki1 and Hiroyuki Horikoshi2

1 Department of Radiology, Fujioka General Hospital, 942-1 Fujioka, Fujiokashi, Gunma 375-8503, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Gunma Cancer Tomo Hospital, Gunma, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a new criterion—maximum depth of the intraluminal appendiceal fluid—is useful to differentiate between a normal appendix with diameter greater than 6 mm and appendicitis without periappendiceal inflammation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study included 59 patients showing a normal appendix with diameter greater than 6 mm and having no adjacent lesions (noncomplicated-normal-appendix group), 30 patients showing a normal appendix with diameter greater than 6 mm and having adjacent lesions (complicated-normal-appendix group), and 38 patients showing appendicitis without periappendiceal inflammation (appendicitis group). The following specific CT findings were retrospectively evaluated: maximum appendiceal diameter greater than 6 mm, maximum appendiceal wall thickness greater than 3 mm, appendiceal wall enhancement, focal cecal wall thickening, adjacent adenopathy, appendicolith, and maximum depth of the intraluminal appendiceal fluid.

RESULTS. The mean maximum depth of the intraluminal appendiceal fluid in the appendicitis group was significantly higher than in the two groups with a normal appendix (Mann-Whitney U test: p < 0.001). When using maximum depth of the intraluminal appendiceal fluid greater than 2.6 mm for a criterion of appendicitis, sensitivity and specificity for differentiation between the appendicitis group and the other two groups with a normal appendix were both greater than 80%. In contrast, when using another CT a criterion, either sensitivity or specificity was 50% or less.

CONCLUSION. The new CT criterion based on the maximum depth of the intraluminal appendiceal fluid greater than 2.6 mm is particularly useful for differentiating appendicitis without periappendiceal inflammation from a normal appendix with a diameter greater than 6 mm.

Keywords: abdominal imaging • appendicitis • CT • gastrointestinal imaging


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.