HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Taylor, A. Articles by Garcia, E. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Taylor, A. Articles by Garcia, E. V. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Evaluation of Two Diuresis Renography Decision Support Systems to Determine the Need for Furosemide in Patients with Suspected Obstruction

¹ Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton St., Atlanta, GA 30322.
² Department of Biostatistics, Emory University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA.
³ Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the decisions regarding the need for furosemide made by two independent renal decision support systems, RENEX and CAR-TAN, with the need for furosemide determined in clinical practice and by expert reviewers using the baseline plus furosemide protocol.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. RENEX and CARTAN are independent decision support systems that reach their conclusions without operator input. RENEX is a knowledge-based system and CARTAN is a statistical decision support system. Both were trained using the same pilot group of 31 adult patients (61 kidneys) referred for suspected obstruction. Subsequently, both systems were prospectively applied to 102 patients (200 kidneys) of whom 70 received furosemide; decisions regarding the need for furosemide were compared with the clinical decisions and the decisions of three experts who independently scored each kidney on the need for furosemide. Differences were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS. RENEX agreed with the clinical and experts' decisions to give furosemide in 97% (68/70) and 98% (65/66) of patients, respectively, whereas CARTAN agreed in 90% (63/70) and 89% (59/66), respectively, p < 0.03. In contrast, CARTAN agreed with the experts' decision to withhold furosemide in 78% of kidneys (87/111), whereas RENEX agreed in only 69% of kidneys (77/111), p = 0.008.

CONCLUSION. Use of RENEX or CARTAN as decision support tools in the baseline plus furosemide protocol has the potential to help the radiologist avoid unnecessary imaging and reduce the technologist, computer, camera, and physician time required to perform the procedure.

Keywords: genitourinary tract imaging • kidney • nuclear medicine • radiology practice • renal disease

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Taylor, E. V. Garcia, J. N. G. Binongo, A. Manatunga, R. Halkar, R. D. Folks, and E. Dubovsky Diagnostic Performance of an Expert System for Interpretation of 99mTc MAG3 Scans in Suspected Renal Obstruction J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 216 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]