AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laeseke, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, F. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laeseke, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, F. T., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.1004
AJR 2007; 188:1485-1494
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Multiple-Electrode Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Malignancies: Initial Clinical Experience

Paul F. Laeseke1, Tina M. Frey2, Chris L. Brace2, Lisa A. Sampson2, Thomas C. Winter, III2, Jan R. Ketzler2 and Fred T. Lee, Jr.2

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792-3252.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to retrospectively analyze our initial clinical experience with percutaneous multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablation and evaluate its safety and efficacy for treating hepatic malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-eight malignant hepatic tumors (mean diameter, 2.7 cm; range, 0.7–10.0 cm) in 23 patients (12 men and 11 women; mean age, 65 years; range, 40–84 years) were treated in 26 radiofrequency ablation sessions with an impedance-based multiple-electrode system. One, two, or three (mean, 2.4) 17-gauge electrodes were placed, and tumors were ablated using a combination of CT and sonography for guidance and monitoring. Electrodes were placed in close proximity (mean spacing: two electrodes, 1.0 cm; three electrodes, 1.4 cm) to treat large tumors or were used independently to treat several tumors simultaneously. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were obtained immediately after ablation to determine technical success and evaluate for complications. Follow-up CT scans at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (mean, 4 months) after ablation were obtained to assess for tumor progression and new metastases.

RESULTS. Local control was achieved in 37 of 38 tumors, 34 of which were treated in one session. Ablations created with closely spaced electrodes had a mean diameter of 4.9 cm. The total ablation time was reduced by approximately 54% compared with an equivalent number of ablations performed with a single-electrode system (1,014 vs 2,196 minutes). Three complications occurred: one death from a presumed postprocedure pulmonary embolus, one pneumothorax, and one asymptomatic perihepatic hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION. Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablation appears to be a safe and effective means of achieving local control in large or multiple hepatic malignancies at short-term follow-up.

Keywords: CT • hepatobiliary imaging • hepatocellular carcinoma • interventional radiology • liver cancer • MRI • oncologic imaging • radiofrequency ablation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.