AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollingsworth, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollingsworth, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.1507
AJR 2007; 189:12-18
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Pediatric Cardiac-Gated CT Angiography: Assessment of Radiation Dose

Caroline L. Hollingsworth1, Terry T. Yoshizumi1,2, Donald P. Frush1, Frandics P. Chan3, Greta Toncheva2, Giao Nguyen2, Carolyn R. Lowry1 and Lynne M. Hurwitz1

1 Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, 1905 McGovern-Davison Children's Health Center, Box 3803, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
2 Division of Radiation Safety, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
3 Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine a dose range for cardiac-gated CT angiography (CTA) in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. ECG-gated cardiac CTA simulating scanning of the heart was performed on an anthropomorphic phantom of a 5-year-old child on a 16-MDCT scanner using variable parameters (small field of view; 16 x 0.625 mm configuration; 0.5-second gantry cycle time; 0.275 pitch; 120 kVp at 110, 220, and 330 mA; and 80 kVp at 385 mA). Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) technology measured 20 organ doses. Effective dose calculated using the dose–length product (DLP) was compared with effective dose determined from measured absorbed organ doses.

RESULTS. Highest organ doses included breast (3.5–12.6 cGy), lung (3.3–12.1 cGy), and bone marrow (1.7–7.6 cGy). The 80 kVp/385 mA examination produced lower radiation doses to all organs than the 120 kVp/220 mA examination. MOSFET effective doses (± SD) were as follows: 110 mA: 7.4 mSv (± 0.6 mSv), 220 mA: 17.2 mSv (± 0.3 mSv), 330 mA: 25.7 mSv (± 0.3 mSv), 80 kVp/385 mA: 10.6 mSv (± 0.2 mSv). DLP effective doses for diagnostic runs were as follows: 110 mA: 8.7 mSv, 220 mA: 19 mSv, 330 mA: 28 mSv, 80 kVp/385 mA: 12 mSv. DLP effective doses exceeded MOSFET effective doses by 9.7–17.2%.

CONCLUSION. Radiation doses for a 5-year-old during cardiac-gated CTA vary greatly depending on parameters. Organ doses can be high; the effective dose may reach 28.4 mSv. Further work, including determination of size-appropriate mA and image quality, is important before routine use of this technique in children.

Keywords: CT angiography • dosimetry • pediatric radiology • radiation dose


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. R. Dillman and R. J. Hernandez
Role of CT in the Evaluation of Congenital Cardiovascular Disease in Children
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2009; 192(5): 1219 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. R. Mayo and J. A. Leipsic
Radiation Dose in Cardiac CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 646 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Coursey, D. P. Frush, T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and S. B. Greenberg
Pediatric Chest MDCT Using Tube Current Modulation: Effect on Radiation Dose with Breast Shielding
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W54 - W61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.