HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, S. H. Articles by Choi, B. I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, S. H. Articles by Choi, B. I. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Computer-Aided Detection of Colonic Polyps at CT Colonography Using a Hessian Matrix–Based Algorithm: Preliminary Study

¹ Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28, Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
² Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
³ Department of Medical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
⁴ Department of Radiology, Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, Roeselare, Belgium.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to develop a Hessian matrix–based computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm for polyp detection on CT colonography (CTC) and to analyze its performance in a high-risk population.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The CTC data sets of 35 patients with at least one colonoscopically proven polyp were interpreted with a Hessian matrix–based CAD algorithm, which was designed to depict bloblike structures protruding into the lumen. Our gold standard was a combination of segmental unblinded optical colonoscopy and retrospective unblinded consensus review by two radiologists. Sensitivity of CAD for polyp detection was evaluated on both per-polyp and per-patient bases. The average number of false-positive detections was calculated, and the causes of false-positives and false-negatives were analyzed.

RESULTS. Ninety-four polyps were identified on colonoscopy. Forty-six polyps were smaller than 6 mm and 48 were 6 mm or larger. Seventy-five (79.8%) of these 94 polyps were identified by radiologists in a retrospective review. When colonoscopy was used as a standard of reference, the sensitivity of CAD was 77.1% for polyps 6 mm or larger. For large polyps ( 6 mm) that could be identified on retrospective review, the CAD algorithm achieved sensitivities of 92.5% (37/40) and 91.7% (22/24), respectively, on per-polyp and per-patient bases. There were an average of 5.5 false-positive detections per patient and 3.1 false-positive detections per data set for CAD. The two most frequent causes of false-positives on CAD were prominent or converging fold (78/191) and feces (50/191). Of the three polyps 6 mm or larger that were missed by CAD, two had a flat appearance on colonoscopy and the remaining one was located in the narrow area between the rectal tube and the rectal wall.

CONCLUSION. A Hessian matrix–based CAD algorithm for CTC has the potential to depict polyps larger than or equal to 6 mm with high sensitivity and an acceptable false-positive rate.

Keywords: colon • computer-aided detection • CT • CT colonography • neoplasm • polyps

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. W. Lee, S. H. Kim, H. S. Park, J.-G. Lee, S. M. Joo, S. An, and B. I. Choi An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study of Computer-Aided Detection Performance for Polyp Detection on CT Colonography: A Comparison of Commercially and Academically Available Systems Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 445 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]