AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, J.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, J.
Right arrow Articles by White, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.0736
AJR 2007; 189:414-419
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Cardiac CT Angiography After Coronary Bypass Surgery: Prevalence of Incidental Findings

Jeffrey Mueller1,2, Jean Jeudy1, Robert Poston3 and Charles S. White1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
3 Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

OBJECTIVE. Cardiac CT angiography (CTA) is commonly performed after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) to assess graft patency, but the images also include parts of the lungs, abdomen, and mediastinum. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively assess the prevalence of unsuspected disease identified on cardiac CTA examinations after CABG and to determine their potential clinical significance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. CTA was performed postoperatively in 259 patients (mean, 5.2 days), and 40 patients underwent a follow-up CT scan (mean, 12.7 months). Cardiac CTA was acquired using a 16-MDCT scanner with ECG-gating and bolus timing with a small field of view centered on the heart. Two thoracic radiologists assessed each examination in consensus. The prevalence of graft disease and incidental findings (cardiac and noncardiac) was established. The electronic medical record was reviewed. A finding was judged potentially significant if a therapeutic intervention or radiologic follow-up was deemed advisable on the basis of the cardiac CTA. Bypass graft occlusions were analyzed separately.

RESULTS. In the immediate postoperative period, 51 patients (19.7%) had at least one unsuspected, potentially significant finding. Twenty-four patients (9.3%) had a cardiac finding such as a ventricular pseudoaneurysm, ventricular perfusion deficit, or intracardiac thrombus, and 34 patients (13.1%) had a noncardiac finding including pulmonary embolism, lung cancer, or pneumonia. At least one bypass graft was occluded in 17 patients (6.6%) in the immediate postoperative period. In the later postoperative period, seven patients (17.5%) had a potentially significant unsuspected finding. Four patients (10.0%) had at least one graft occlusion.

CONCLUSION. Cardiac CTA after CABG revealed a high prevalence of unsuspected cardiac and noncardiac findings with potential clinical significance. Interpreters of these studies should be familiar with the spectrum of these abnormalities.

Keywords: bypass • cardiac imaging • CT coronary arteriography • lung diseases


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Brinker
The left main facts: faced, spun, but alas too few.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 4, 2008; 51(9): 893 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.