AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ohnaka, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ohnaka, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2085
AJR 2007; 189:W78-W83
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Differentiation of Femoral Versus Inguinal Hernia: CT Findings

Shigeru Suzuki1, Shigeru Furui1, Kota Okinaga2, Tsutomu Sakamoto3, Jun Murata4, Akira Furukawa5 and Yasuo Ohnaka6

1 Department of Radiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan.
2 Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
3 Department of Radiology, Kohga Public Hospital, Shiga, Japan.
4 Department of Surgery, Asakadai Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
5 Department of Radiology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
6 Department of Radiology, Osaka-fu Saiseikai Noe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to investigate the CT findings of femoral hernias, focusing on their differentiation from inguinal hernias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed the records of 46 femoral hernias in seven centers (review of femoral hernias) and those of 215 groin hernias (femoral hernias, 11; inguinal hernias, 204) in one center (review of groin hernias). We evaluated the presence of hernia, extent of hernia sac based on the relationship between the hernia sac and the pubic tubercle (localized sac: sac was localized lateral to the pubic tubercle; or extended sac: sac extended medial to the pubic tubercle), and compression of the femoral vein on CT images. The chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between the CT findings and femoral versus inguinal hernias in the review of groin hernias.

RESULTS. In the review of 46 femoral hernias, the lesions were detected on CT in 45. In the 45 lesions, all hernia sacs were localized, and 42 lesions showed venous compression. In the review of 215 groin hernias, all 11 femoral hernias had localized sacs with venous compression on CT. Of the 204 inguinal hernias, 98 lesions were detected on CT, 65 had extended sacs, and only 10 showed venous compression. Localized sacs with venous compression were seen much more often in the femoral hernias (11/11, 100%) than in the inguinal hernias (1/92, 1.1%) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION. CT images are useful to differentiate femoral hernias from inguinal hernias.

Keywords: abdominal imaging • CT • femoral hernia • hernia • inguinal hernia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.