|
|
||||||||
Review |
1 Department of Radiology, MIA Victoria, 1355 High St., Malvern, Victoria 3144, Australia.
OBJECTIVE. CT has undergone generational change that has led to true volume imaging. Interpretation of volume images requires interaction between the radiologist and the volume data sets. The aim of this review is to examine postprocessing options and the evidence in the literature for changing the process of reporting to digital volume reporting.
CONCLUSION. Diagnostic confidence and the accuracy of interpretation of volume CT images have increased with improvements in postprocessing techniques.
Keywords: CT postprocessing reporting volume imaging
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Graves, R. T. Black, and D. J. Lomas Constrained Surface Controllers for Three-dimensional Image Data Reformatting Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 218 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Johnson, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman Nonvascular Mesenteric Disease: Utility of Multidetector CT with 3D Volume Rendering1 RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 721 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Johnson, K. M. Horton, S. Kawamoto, J. Eng, M. J. Bean, S. J. Shan, and E. K. Fishman MDCT for Suspected Appendicitis: Effect of Reconstruction Section Thickness on Diagnostic Accuracy, Rate of Appendiceal Visualization, and Reader Confidence Using Axial Images Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 893 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |