AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2137
AJR 2007; 189:807-813
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Unsuspected Mesenteric Arterial Abnormality: Comparison of MDCT Axial Sections to Interactive 3D Rendering

Jennifer K. Chen1, Pamela T. Johnson1,2, Karen M. Horton1,2 and Elliot K. Fishman1,2

1 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
2 Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St., Room 3251, Baltimore, MD 21287.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine how frequently significant mesenteric arterial abnormalities that were identified by interactive 3D CT with volume rendering and maximum intensity projection were detected by axial images alone in a series of patients for whom there was no clinical suspicion of mesenteric vascular disease. Axial CT and 3D interpretations were compared for lesions involving the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries or their branches. On a per-patient basis, the axial and 3D interpretations were equivalent in 24% (10/41) of the cases. Axial CT partially agreed with 3D CT in 10% (4/41), and no mesenteric arterial lesion was reported on axial CT in 66% (27/41). The 3D CT findings were supported by other imaging, surgery, clinical findings, or management in 49% (20/41) of the cases. The mesenteric lesions identified resulted in a change in patient management in 15% (6/41) of the subjects.

CONCLUSION. Unsuspected mesenteric arterial abnormality may elude diagnosis when axial MDCT sections are interpreted without 3D renderings.

Keywords: celiac artery • CT • CT angiography • MDCT • superior mesenteric artery • 3D rendering


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. T. Johnson, K. M. Horton, and E. K. Fishman
Nonvascular Mesenteric Disease: Utility of Multidetector CT with 3D Volume Rendering1
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 721 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.