AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colen, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Anzai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Colen, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Anzai, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2491
AJR 2007; 189:898-903
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Effectiveness of MDCT Angiography for the Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Teran W. Colen1, Lilian C. Wang1, Basavaraj V. Ghodke2, Wendy A. Cohen2, William Hollingworth3 and Yoshimi Anzai1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St., RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7115.
2 Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
3 Harborview Injury Prevention Research Center, Seattle, WA.

OBJECTIVE. CT angiography (CTA) is a noninvasive imaging technique used to evaluate cerebral vascular structures. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), although invasive, is the gold standard for diagnosing intracranial aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CTA in the detection of intracranial aneurysms for patients with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in a level 1 trauma center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT in 336 consecutive patients undergoing evaluation for nontraumatic SAH with both CTA and 3D DSA within 48 hours. The diagnostic performance of CTA was assessed by radiology reports using DSA as the gold standard. Analyses were performed per aneurysm and per patient, the results were stratified by aneurysm size and location, and the MDCT data—16-MDCT data versus 4-, 8-, and 16-MDCT combined data—were compared.

RESULTS. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CTA per aneurysm was 83% (CI, 0.78–0.87) and 93% (0.88–0.97), respectively. CTA failed to detect 49 of the 284 aneurysms. Thirty-nine (80%) of these 49 missed aneurysms were ≤ 3 mm, nine (18%) were 4–6 mm, and one (2%) was 7–10 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of CTA per patient was 95% (0.91–0.97) and 97% (0.92–0.99), respectively. Of 211 patients, a primary aneurysm was missed on CTA in 11 patients.

CONCLUSION. CTA showed excellent diagnostic performance for aneurysm detection. The high negative predictive value (91.2%) for the per-patient analysis indicates that CTA has merit as a screening tool. Most aneurysms missed were ≤ 3 mm and in patients in whom a primary aneurysm had already been detected.

Keywords: aneurysm • cerebral vasculature • CT angiography • digital subtraction angiography • MDCT angiography • neurovascular injury • rotational angiography • subarachnoid hemorrhage


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.