AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koktzoglou, I.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koktzoglou, I.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2428
AJR 2007; 189:966-972
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Original Research

Dark-Blood MRI of the Thoracic Aorta with 3D Diffusion-Prepared Steady-State Free Precession: Initial Clinical Evaluation

Ioannis Koktzoglou1,2,3, Anish Kirpalani1,4, Timothy J. Carroll1,2, Debiao Li1,2 and James C. Carr1

1 Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 448 E Ontario St., Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60611.
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University McCormick School of Engineering, Chicago, IL.
3 Present address: Department of Radiology, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Walgreen Jr. Bldg., 2650 Ridge Ave., Suite G507, Evanston, IL 60201.
4 Present address: Texas Radiology Associates, Plano, TX.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of 3D diffusion-prepared balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging with that of 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography in evaluation of the thoracic aorta.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-one patients with indications for contrast-enhanced MR angiography and diffusion-prepared SSFP of the thoracic aorta were involved in this retrospective chart review study conducted with 1.5-T MRI. Two observers scored the quality of the contrast-enhanced MR angiographic and diffusion-prepared SSFP images on the basis of depicting the thoracic aorta. Image quality scores and diametric measurements of the aorta from both image sets were compared.

RESULTS. Diametric measurements of the thoracic aorta showed a strong linear association (r = 0.971, p < 0.0001; regression line indifferent from line of equality, p < 0.05). The aortic root was better visualized with contrast-enhanced MR angiography (image quality score, 3.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.0 ± 0.8 of 5; p < 0.05); however, the aortic wall was better visualized with diffusion-prepared SSFP (image quality score, 4.4 ± 0.6 vs 1.9 ± 0.3 of 5; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION. Three-dimensional diffusion-prepared SSFP yields better image quality than 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography in evaluation of the thoracic aortic wall and appears to be a useful adjunct to 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography for assessing aortic abnormalities before administration of a contrast agent.

Keywords: 3D imaging • dark-blood imaging • MR angiography • thoracic aorta • vascular wall imaging


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.