AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ocak, I.
Right arrow Articles by Choyke, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ocak, I.
Right arrow Articles by Choyke, P. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.06.1329
AJR 2007; 189:W192-W201
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer at 3 T: A Study of Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Iclal Ocak1,2, Marcelino Bernardo3, Greg Metzger4, Tristan Barrett1, Peter Pinto5, Paul S. Albert6 and Peter L. Choyke1

1 Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582.
3 NCI Molecular Imaging Program and Research Technology Program, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., Frederick, MD.
4 Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
5 Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
6 Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.

OBJECTIVE. The objectives of our study were to determine whether dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI performed at 3 T and analyzed using a pharmacokinetic model improves the diagnostic performance of MRI for the detection of prostate cancer compared with conventional T2-weighted imaging, and to determine which pharmacokinetic parameters are useful in diagnosing prostate cancer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective study included 50 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent imaging of the prostate on a 3-T scanner with a combination of a sensitivity-encoding (SENSE) cardiac coil and an endorectal coil. Scans were obtained at least 5 weeks after biopsy. T2-weighted turbo spin-echo images were obtained in three planes, and dynamic contrast-enhanced images were acquired during a single-dose bolus injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated for T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The following pharmacokinetic modeling parameters were determined and compared for cancer, inflammation, and healthy peripheral zone: Ktrans (forward volume transfer constant), kep (reverse reflux rate constant between extracellular space and plasma), ve (the fractional volume of extracellular space per unit volume of tissue), and the area under the gadolinium concentration curve (AUGC) in the first 90 seconds after injection.

RESULTS. Pathologically confirmed cancers in the peripheral zone of the prostate were characterized by their low signal intensity on T2-weighted scans and by their early enhancement, early washout, or both on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of T2-weighted imaging were 94%, 37%, 50%, and 89%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were 73%, 88%, 75%, and 75%, respectively. Ktrans, kep, and AUGC were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in cancer than in normal peripheral zone. The vE parameter was not significantly associated with prostate cancer.

CONCLUSION. MRI of the prostate performed at 3 T using an endorectal coil produces high-quality T2-weighted images; however, specificity for prostate cancer is improved by also performing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and using pharmacokinetic parameters, particularly Ktrans and kep, for analysis. These results are comparable to published results at 1.5 T.

Keywords: dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI • genitourinary imaging • MRI • pharmacokinetics • prostate cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.