HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Song, J. H. Articles by Mayo-Smith, W. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Song, J. H. Articles by Mayo-Smith, W. W. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

The Incidental Indeterminate Adrenal Mass on CT (> 10 H) in Patients Without Cancer: Is Further Imaging Necessary? Follow-Up of 321 Consecutive Indeterminate Adrenal Masses

¹ All authors: Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy St., Providence, RI 02903.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine whether follow-up imaging evaluation is necessary for incidentally discovered indeterminate adrenal lesions (> 10 H) on CT in patients with no known malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A computer search of CT reports from January 2000 to December 2003 identified patients with incidentally detected, indeterminate, but benign-appearing adrenal lesions who had no known malignancy and no clinical suspicion of hyperfunctioning adrenal mass. Patients with adrenal masses diagnostic on the initial CT or heterogeneous masses were excluded. Two hundred ninety patients with 321 lesions met the study criteria. Each lesion was determined to be benign or malignant based on histopathology, characterization with diagnostic imaging studies, or a minimum of 1 year of stability on imaging follow-up or 2 years of stability on clinical follow-up.

RESULTS. Of the 321 lesions, 318 masses (99.1%) were confirmed to be benign and clinically insignificant. These included three (0.9%) histologically confirmed adenomas, 198 (61.7%) adenomas by imaging characterization, five (1.6%) other benign lesions, 71 (22.1%) masses stable on imaging follow-up, and 41 (12.8%) masses with clinical stability. There were three (0.9%) clinically unsuspected functioning masses: one cortisol-producing adenoma and two pheochromocytomas. There were no metastatic adrenal lesions, even among the 13 patients who subsequently developed malignancy elsewhere.

CONCLUSION. All of the incidentally detected adrenal masses with a CT attenuation of > 10 H were benign in patients with no known malignancy. Follow-up imaging to characterize an incidental adrenal mass appears to have a limited role in this patient cohort.

Keywords: adenoma • adrenal glands • adrenal mass • benign adenoma • CT • incidental adrenal mass • incidentalomas • neoplasms

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. J. Mazzaglia and J. M. Monchik Limited Value of Adrenal Biopsy in the Evaluation of Adrenal Neoplasm: A Decade of Experience Arch Surg, May 1, 2009; 144(5): 465 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. D. Craig, J. C. Fanburg-Smith, L. R. Henry, R. Guerrero, and J. H Barton Fat-containing Lesions of the Retroperitoneum: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 261 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Is Follow-Up Imaging Necessary for Benign-Appearing Adrenal Incidentalomas? Journal Watch (General), December 11, 2007; 2007(1211): 2 - 2. [Full Text]