AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujikawa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ukegawa, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujikawa, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ukegawa, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2260
AJR 2007; 189:1169-1174
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Achilles Tendon After Percutaneous Surgical Repair: Serial MRI Observation of Uncomplicated Healing

Akira Fujikawa1, Yukishige Kyoto1, Masahisa Kawaguchi2, Yutaka Naoi1 and Yo Ukegawa2

1 Department of Radiology, Japan Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital, 1-2-24, Ikejiri, Setagaya, Tokyo 154-8532, Japan.
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Japan Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively explore the MRI features of normal healing of the expected residual tendon gap in the Achilles tendon after percutaneous surgical repair.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. MR images of the Achilles tendon were obtained approximately 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. Assessment of MR images was focused on the presence of residual tendon gap and gap length, Achilles tendon contour, and contrast enhancement in the ruptured area. Cases of open surgical repair were used for comparison. We attempted to statistically compare the timing of tendon gap disappearance within the percutaneous surgical repair group and between the percutaneous and open surgical repair groups.

RESULTS. A total of 30 tendons repaired with percutaneous surgical technique and 10 repaired with open surgical technique were evaluated. At the first, second, and third MRI sessions of the percutaneous surgical repair group, a residual gap was found in 100%, 80%, and none of the tendons on T1-weighted images and in 87%, 63%, and none of the tendons on T2-weighted images. Achilles tendon contour was visualized in 30%, 90%, and 100% of the tendons on T1-weighted images and 90%, 100%, and 100% of the tendons on T2-weighted images. Intratendinous enhancement was present in 100%, 73%, and 7% of the tendons in the percutaneous surgical repair group. Ring-shaped peritendinous enhancement was recognized at the third session in all subjects. A significantly longer time was required for tendon gap disappearance after percutaneous than after open surgical repair.

CONCLUSION. The time course of the MR findings in the ruptured Achilles tendon after percutaneous surgical repair appears to reflect regular healing.

Keywords: Achilles tendon • MRI • orthopedic surgery


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.