HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Metser, U. Articles by Even-Sapir, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Metser, U. Articles by Even-Sapir, E. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Benign Nonphysiologic Lesions with Increased ¹⁸F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT: Characterization and Incidence

¹ Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, 6 Weizman St., Tel-Aviv 64239, Israel.
² Department of Radiology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to characterize benign lesions showing increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and to determine their incidence on whole-body FDG PET/CT performed in oncologic patients. In addition, the performance of PET alone and PET/CT in characterizing lesions as benign was compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review of 1,134 consecutive reports of PET/CT studies performed in patients with proven or suspected malignancy over a 6-month period yielded 289 patients with 313 lesions that showed increased FDG uptake but were suspected to be benign (nonphysiologic) or indeterminate. Lesions were subjectively categorized on the basis of the intensity of FDG uptake (mild, moderate, or marked) as compared with background activity. For each lesion, a decision was made as to whether a benign diagnosis could be obtained by the CT part of the study, the PET pattern, or clinical correlation, or whether histologic sampling was necessary. The performance of PET alone and PET/CT for characterizing lesions as benign was compared. Two hundred twenty-nine of the lesions were assessed further: 210 were benign and 19, malignant. The final diagnosis was determined by pathology (n = 67), PET/CT follow-up (n = 58), correlative imaging (n = 59), clinical correlation (n = 32), or typical benign pattern on PET/CT (n = 13).

RESULTS. The causes for benign uptake of FDG were inflammatory processes (n = 154, 73.3%), benign tumors (n = 23, 11%), hematoma or seroma (n = 17, 8.1%), fracture (n = 7, 3.3%), fat necrosis (n = 3, 1.4%), and others (n = 6, 2.9%). For lesions with moderate or marked uptake of FDG (n = 117, 55.7%), a benign diagnosis could have been suggested on either PET or CT (e.g., a "hot" osteophyte) in 33 lesions (28.2%), on CT alone (e.g., peritoneal fat necrosis) in 38 lesions (32.5%), on PET alone (e.g., sialadenitis) in 10 lesions (8.5%), or by clinical correlation (e.g., dental abscess) in four lesions (3.4%). A benign diagnosis could not be established without histology (e.g., colonic polyp) in 32 lesions (27.4%). The performance of PET/CT was superior to that of PET alone in characterizing lesions as benign (p< 0.001).

CONCLUSION. Benign lesions with increased FDG uptake are found in more than 25% of the PET/CT studies performed in patients with proven or suspected malignancy, with inflammation being the most common cause. Lesion characterization on the CT portion of the PET/CT study increases the specificity of PET/CT reporting, especially for lesions with moderate or marked FDG uptake.

Keywords: benign lesions • FDG PET • oncologic imaging • PET/CT • whole-body imaging

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N K Singh, G J R Cook, V J Lewington, and S C Chua PET/CT assessment of clinically unsuspected, incidental FDG-avid lesions in oncological patients Imaging, September 1, 2008; 20(3): 159 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]