AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haber, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haber, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Fuchs, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2468
AJR 2007; 189:1525-1529
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Transperineal Sonography for Determination of the Type of Imperforate Anus

Hans P. Haber1, Guido Seitz2, Steven W. Warmann2 and Jörg Fuchs2

1 Department of Pediatric Radiology, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess whether transperineal sonography is valid and accurate for discriminating the low (translevator) type of imperforate anus from the intermediate and high (supralevator) types. The distinction is critical in determination of the surgical approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-six consecutively enrolled infants (0–90 days old) with imperforate anus underwent transperineal gray-scale sonography with a 12-MHz linear array transducer. The distance between the distal rectal pouch and the perineum was measured, and a cutoff distance for differentiating types of imperforate anus was identified. The sonographic findings were compared with the final diagnosis reached with radiographic and surgical findings.

RESULTS. Transperineal sonography was feasible in all children without specific preparation. The mean distance between the distal rectal pouch and the perineum in the 22 infants with low imperforate anus was 10 ± 4 (SD) mm compared with a mean of 24 ± 6 mm in the 34 infants with intermediate or high anomalies (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of transperineal sonography was 100%; all 34 cases of intermediate or high imperforate anus were identified with a cutoff distance between the distal rectal pouch and the perineum of 15 mm. The specificity of sonography was 86% and the accuracy, 95%.

CONCLUSION. Transperineal sonography is a valid and accurate noninvasive imaging technique for differentiating low and intermediate or high imperforate anus.

Keywords: anorectal anomaly • imperforate anus • pediatric radiology • sonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.