HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Strauss, S. Articles by Katsnelson, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Strauss, S. Articles by Katsnelson, L. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Sonographic Assessment of Fatty Liver

¹ All authors: Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Zerifin 70300, Israel.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver and intraobserver variability in the sonographic assessment of the presence and severity of fatty liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively evaluated the static images of 168 adult patients who had undergone abdominal sonography. Three experienced radiologists independently graded the hepatic images as normal, mild steatosis, moderate steatosis, or severe steatosis. Assessment of liver steatosis was repeated on the same set of images 1 month later under the same conditions and blinded to the initial reading. Weighted kappa statistics were used to analyze interobserver and intraobserver agreement, and the agreement percentages were calculated.

RESULTS. The mean interobserver and intraobserver agreement rates for the presence of fatty liver were 72% ( = 0.43) and 76% ( = 0.54). For severity of fatty liver, the initial reading for pairs of observers had 47-59% ( = 0.40-0.51) interobserver agreement. The interobserver agreement for the second reading was 59-64% ( = 0.43-0.54). The mean agreement rates for pairs of observers were 53% ( = 0.47) and 62% ( = 0.50) on the first and second readings. Intraobserver agreement for severity of fatty liver ranged from 55% to 68% ( = 0.51-0.63).

CONCLUSION. Subjective visual assessment of fatty liver on sonography has substantial observer variability. There is a need for a more objective quantitative method of grading fatty liver on sonography that would be easily available and applicable in routine clinical practice.

Keywords: fatty liver • sonography • steatosis

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Ma, N.-S. Holalkere, A. K. R, M. Mino-Kenudson, P. F. Hahn, and D. V. Sahani Imaging-based Quantification of Hepatic Fat: Methods and Clinical Applications RadioGraphics, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 1253 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]