AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bosch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bosch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, E. C., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2445
AJR 2008; 190:179-186
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Safety and Efficacy of Gadofosveset-Enhanced MR Angiography for Evaluation of Pedal Arterial Disease: Multicenter Comparative Phase 3 Study

Enrique Bosch1, Karl-Friedrich Kreitner2, Mario Fava Peirano3, Siegfried Thurner4, Kohkan Shamsi5,6 and Edward C. Parsons, Jr.7

1 Hospital Clinica Alemana, Santiago, Chile.
2 Klinik und Poliklinik fur Radiologie der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
3 Hospital Clinico de la Universidad Catolica, Servicio Radiologia, Santiago, Chile.
4 Krankenhaus der Barmherziegen Bruder, Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.
5 Bayer HealthCare, Montville, New Jersey, 07045.
6 Present address: Symbiotic Pharma Research, Pine Brook, NJ.
7 EPIX Pharmaceuticals, 4 Maguire Rd., Lexington, MA 02421.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gadofosveset, a gadolinium-based albumin-binding MRI contrast agent, in patients with pedal arterial disease.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A total of 185 adult patients with known or suspected pedal arterial disease were randomized in a group receiving 0.03 mmol/kg and a group receiving 0.05 mmol/kg of gadofosveset for MR angiography of the pedal arteries. Gadofosveset-enhanced and unenhanced time-of-flight MR angiograms were compared with conventional angiograms, the standard of reference, for the presence of vascular stenosis. All patients underwent drug safety analysis.

RESULTS. For each of three blinded readers, the specificity (21-35%) of gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography was a statistically significant (p < 0.010) improvement over that of unenhanced MR angiography in the detection of clinically significant (> 50%) stenosis. The sensitivities of the two techniques were similar. For all blinded readers of MR angiograms, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were higher with use of the 0.03-mmol/kg dose of gadofosveset than with the 0.05-mmol/kg dose. In the 0.03-mmol/kg group, 28% of patients reported a total of 50 adverse events, 96% of which were reported as mild or moderate. In the 0.05-mmol/kg group, 28% of patients reported a total of 55 adverse events, 98% of which were reported as mild or moderate. No patients died; one patient left the study because of myocardial infarction considered unrelated to the study drug.

CONCLUSION. Because of markedly better efficacy than no contrast agent and a minimal and transient side-effect profile, 0.03 mmol/kg of gadofosveset was found safe and effective for MR angiography of patients with pedal arterial disease.

Keywords: angiography • arteries • contrast media • MR angiography • pedal artery • peripheral arterial disease • vascular studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Kau, J. Gasser, S. Celedin, E. Rabitsch, W. Eicher, E. Uhl, and K.A. Hausegger
MR Angiographic Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Detachable Coils: Evaluation of a Blood-Pool Contrast Medium
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2009; 30(8): 1524 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Kos, C. Reisinger, M. Aschwanden, G. M. Bongartz, A. L. Jacob, and D. Bilecen
Pedal Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: First-Pass IV Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography with Blood Pool Contrast Medium Versus Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 775 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.