HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jamadar, D. A. Articles by Girish, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jamadar, D. A. Articles by Girish, G. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Musculoskeletal Sonography Technique: Focused Versus Comprehensive Evaluation

¹ All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., TC2910, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

OBJECTIVE. This article evaluates the utility of performing a focused musculoskeletal sonography examination on the basis of patients' presenting complaints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Six hundred two patients evaluated over 6 months were scanned using a routine protocol. At the completion of the routine examination, each patient was asked to indicate a focal point of discomfort and, if present, was rescanned over the area of discomfort. Patients were classified in one of five categories depending on whether there was a focal point of discomfort and the presence or absence of an underlying sonographic abnormality.

RESULTS. Eighty-three percent of the 602 patients had a sonographically detectable abnormality, 2.2% of whom had an abnormality not detectable by routine protocol-based scanning. The more peripheral the body part, the more likely that abnormalities detected by sonography correlated with focal symptoms: 81% in the wrist and hand and 73% in the ankle and foot, compared with the more central body parts of 15% in the shoulder and 31% in the hip. Chi-square analysis showed a significant association between the body part scanned and a detectable abnormality (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION. Although a focused examination of the distal extremities correlated with an abnormality in most cases, a protocol-based approach ensured identifying 97.4% of the symptomatic abnormalities. The addition of a focused examination to an examination by protocol further increased the identification of abnormalities.

Keywords: emergency radiology • focused sonography • musculoskeletal sonography • sonography technique • sports medicine • trauma

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Jamadar, B. L. Robertson, J. A. Jacobson, G. Girish, B. J. Sabb, Y. Jiang, and Y. Morag Musculoskeletal Sonography: Important Imaging Pitfalls Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2010; 194(1): 216 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]