AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coursey, C.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coursey, C.
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2017
AJR 2008; 190:W54-W61
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Pediatric Chest MDCT Using Tube Current Modulation: Effect on Radiation Dose with Breast Shielding

Courtney Coursey1, Donald P. Frush1, Terry Yoshizumi2, Greta Toncheva2, Giao Nguyen2 and S. Bruce Greenberg3

1 Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Box 3808, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
2 Radiation Safety Division, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
3 Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the effect on radiation dose and image noise during pediatric chest 16-MDCT using automatic tube current modulation and bismuth breast shields.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Age-based chest 16-MDCT was performed on an anthropomorphic phantom representing a 5-year-old child. Two scans were obtained in each of four sequences: first, without a shield; second, with a 2-ply bismuth shield; third, using automatic tube current modulation with a scout image obtained after placement of the shield; and fourth, using automatic tube current modulation with a scout image obtained before placement of the shield. Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology was used to measure the radiation dose in 20 organ locations. Effective dose was estimated using the console dose-length product. Noise was measured by recording the SD of Hounsfield units in identical regions of interest.

RESULTS. The bismuth breast shield reduced the dose to the breast by 26%. Shielding and automatic tube current modulation reduced the breast dose by 52%. Multiple organ doses were lowest when the shield was placed after the scout radiograph had been obtained. When the shield was placed after the scout image was obtained, the mean noise in the range of shielding increased from 11.4 to 13.1 H (superior mediastinum) and from 10.0 to 12.8 H (heart) (p < 0.01). Increased noise, however, was near the target noise index (measured in SD of Hounsfield units) of 12.0 H (SD). Using automatic tube current modulation, the effective dose was reduced by 35% when the shield was placed after the scout and by 20% when the shield was present in the scout.

CONCLUSION. The greatest dose reduction is achieved by placing the shield after obtaining the scout image to avoid Auto mA compensation due to density of shield. With this technique, image noise increased but remained close to the target noise index.

Keywords: CT • CT technology • MDCT • pediatric chest CT • phantoms • radiation dose reduction • shielding


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.