AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horiguchi, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ito, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horiguchi, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ito, K.
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2191
AJR 2008; 190:315-320
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Radiation Dose, Image Quality, Stenosis Measurement, and CT Densitometry Using ECG-Triggered Coronary 64-MDCT Angiography: A Phantom Study

Jun Horiguchi1, Masao Kiguchi1, Chikako Fujioka1, Yun Shen2, Ryuichi Arie1, Kenichi Sunasaka3 and Katsuhide Ito4

1 Department of Clinical Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi-cho, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
2 CT Lab of Great China, GE Healthcare, Mongkok, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
3 GE Yokogawa Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan.
4 Department of Radiology, Division of Medical Intelligence and Informatics, Programs for Applied Biomedicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated coronary 64-MDCT angiography as to radiation dose, image quality, accuracy of stenosis measurement, and CT densitometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Coronary artery models (n = 3) with different plaque densities ({approx} 50, {approx} 110, and {approx} 1,000 H) on a cardiac phantom were scanned in variable heart rate sequences (n = 14) with both prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated scanning. Radiation dose, image quality graded by motion and stairstep artifacts (grade 1, excellent, to grade 4, poor, with grades 1 and 2 defined as satisfactory), accuracy of stenosis measurement (area; 18%, 50%, and 82%), and CT densitometry of plaques (soft, {approx} 50; and intermediate, {approx} 110 H) were compared between the two protocols using the Mann-Whitney U test and repeated measures.

RESULTS. The radiation dose of prospective ECG-triggered CT angiography (CTA) (3.0 mSv) was lower than that of retrospective ECG-gated CTA (11.7–13.0 mSv) when the same tube current (mA) and voltage (kVp) were used in both methods. Prospective ECG-triggered CTA images were assigned a satisfactory quality rating in stable heart rate up to 75 beats per minute (bpm) when using the minimal X-ray exposure time. In this range, there were no significant differences in stenosis measurement (p = 0.17) and CT densitometry (p = 0.93) between the two protocols.

CONCLUSION. Prospective ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT has the potential to reduce radiation exposure while maintaining the diagnostic performance of retrospective ECG-gated coronary 64-MDCT.

Keywords: cardiac imaging • coronary artery • CT angiography • densitometry • radiation dose • stenosis measurement




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E J HALL and D J BRENNER
Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2008; 81(965): 362 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.