AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Compression Artifacts
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2502
AJR 2008; 190:328-334
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Prediction of Perceptible Artifacts in JPEG 2000–Compressed Chest CT Images Using Mathematical and Perceptual Quality Metrics

Bohyoung Kim1,2, Kyoung Ho Lee1,2, Kil Joong Kim1,2, Rafal Mantiuk3, Seokyung Hahn4, Tae Jung Kim1,2 and Young Hoon Kim1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Seoul 463-707, Korea.
2 Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
3 Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany.
4 Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine whether peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and a perceptual quality metric (High–Dynamic Range Visual Difference Predictor [HDR-VDP]) can predict the presence of perceptible artifacts in Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000–compressed chest CT images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred chest CT images were compressed to 5:1, 8:1, 10:1, and 15:1. Five radiologists determined if the original and compressed images were identical (negative response) or different (positive response). The correlation between the results for each metric and the number of readers with positive responses was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation test. Using the pooled readers' responses as the reference standard, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the cutoff values balancing sensitivity and specificity and yielding 100% sensitivity in each metric. These cutoff values were then used to estimate the visually lossless thresholds for the compressions for the 100 original images, and the accuracy of the estimates of two metrics was compared (McNemar test).

RESULTS. The correlation coefficients were –0.918 and 0.925 for PSNR and the HDR-VDP, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves for the two metrics were 0.983 and 0.984, respectively (p = 0.11). The PSNR and HDR-VDP accurately predicted the visually lossless threshold for 69% and 72% of the 100 images (p = 0.68), respectively, at the cutoff values balancing sensitivity and specificity and for 43% and 47% (p = 0.22), respectively, at the cutoff values reaching 100% sensitivity.

CONCLUSION. Both metrics are promising in predicting the perceptible compression artifacts and therefore can potentially be used to estimate the visually lossless threshold.

Keywords: artifacts • CT • data compression • image quality metric • JPEG 2000 • visually lossless threshold


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. J. Kim, B. Kim, K. H. Lee, T. J. Kim, R. Mantiuk, H.-S. Kang, and Y. H. Kim
Regional Difference in Compression Artifacts in Low-Dose Chest CT Images: Effects of Mathematical and Perceptual Factors
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): W30 - W37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. Bajpai, K. H. Lee, B. Kim, K. J. Kim, T. J. Kim, Y. H. Kim, and H. S. Kang
Differences in Compression Artifacts on Thin- and Thick-Section Lung CT Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): W38 - W43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Ringl, R. Schernthaner, E. Sala, K. El-Rabadi, M. Weber, W. Schima, C. J. Herold, and A. K. Dixon
Lossy 3D JPEG2000 Compression of Abdominal CT Images in Patients with Acute Abdominal Complaints: Effect of Compression Ratio on Diagnostic Confidence and Accuracy
Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 476 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Kim, K. H. Lee, K. J. Kim, R. Mantiuk, H.-r. Kim, and Y. H. Kim
Artifacts in Slab Average-Intensity-Projection Images Reformatted from JPEG 2000 Compressed Thin-Section Abdominal CT Data Sets
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W342 - W350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.