AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2694
AJR 2008; 190:353-360
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Accuracy of Retrograde Ileostomy Radiographic Examination for Detecting Small-Bowel Abnormalities

Jonathan M. Kessler1, Marc S. Levine1, Stephen E. Rubesin1, John L. Rombeau2 and Igor Laufer1

1 Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
2 Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of retrograde ileostomy radiographic examination for detecting small-bowel abnormalities in patients with ileostomies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Our database contained the records of 35 patients who had undergone retrograde ileostomy examinations from 1999–2005 and fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The images from the examinations were reviewed to determine the frequency and nature of small-bowel abnormalities, whether lateral views were obtained, and whether the catheter tip was withdrawn to the stoma. The accuracy of these examinations was determined by correlating clinical, radiographic, and surgical findings.

RESULTS. Twenty-eight (80%) of the patients had small-bowel abnormalities: adhesions in 14 (40%), adynamic small-bowel ileus in four (11%), strictures in two (6%), Crohn's disease in two (6%), focal perforation in two (6%), fistulas (one enterocutaneous and one enterovaginal) in two (6%), metastasis in one (3%), and parastomal hernia in one (3%) of the patients. The other seven (20%) patients had normal findings. Abnormalities were detected on lateral but not frontal or oblique views in six (75%) of eight patients with distal ileal disease and in three (43%) of seven patients for whom views were obtained only after withdrawal of the catheter to the stoma. Retrograde ileostomy examination had a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 86%, positive predictive value of 96%, and negative predictive value of 86%.

CONCLUSION. Our experience suggested that retrograde ileostomy examination is an accurate technique for detecting symptomatic small-bowel abnormalities in patients with ileostomies, particularly in the distal-most portion of the ileum abutting the ileostomy stoma.

Keywords: barium study • fluoroscopy • retrograde ileostomy • small bowel • small-bowel abnormality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.