HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Nael, K. Articles by Finn, J. P. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nael, K. Articles by Finn, J. P.

3-T Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Evaluation of Suspected Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparison with MDCT Angiography

¹ Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, 10945 Le Conte Ave., Suite 3371, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7206.
² Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate a high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced 3-T MR angiography protocol for detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms and to compare the results with those of MDCT angiography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-one patients with suspected intracranial aneurysm underwent high-spatial-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography (CTA). With a generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition algorithm with an acceleration factor of 4 at 3 T, contrast-enhanced MR angiographic images were acquired over 20 seconds with a spatial-resolution of 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.8 mm. CTA images were acquired with a spatial resolution of 0.35 x 0.35 x 0.8 mm on a 16-MDCT scanner in 17 seconds. The images from the two studies were evaluated independently by two neuroradiologists for image quality, presence of aneurysm, and characterization of aneurysm. The dimensions of the aneurysm were measured independently with both techniques.

RESULTS. A total of 25 aneurysms were identified with both contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CTA. A comparative analysis of detection and depiction of aneurysms showed excellent interobserver agreement for both contrast-enhanced MR angiography ( = 0.81) and CTA ( = 0.91) images. There was significant correlation between the techniques for both qualitative assessment of aneurysm depiction ( = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88–0.95) and quantitative dimensional measurement of aneurysm size (r = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92–0.97).

CONCLUSION. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3 T is reliable for evaluation and characterization of intracranial aneurysms. The results are comparable with those of MDCTA.

Keywords: 3 T • comparison studies • CT angiography • intracranial aneurysms • MR angiography • high magnetic field strength • parallel acquisition