AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2310
AJR 2008; 190:396-405
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Preoperative Evaluation of Bile Duct Cancer: MRI Combined with MR Cholangiopancreatography Versus MDCT with Direct Cholangiography

Hee Sun Park1,2, Jeong Min Lee1,2, Jin-Young Choi1,3, Min Woo Lee4, Hyuk Jung Kim5, Joon Koo Han1,2 and Byung Ihn Choi1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, 28, Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
2 Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
3 Present address: Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
4 Department of Radiology, Konkuk University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
5 Department of Radiology, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with that of MDCT combined with direct cholangiography in the evaluation of the tumor extent and resectability of bile duct cancer with surgical and pathologic findings as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. From January 2003 to March 2006, 27 patients (18 men, nine women; mean age, 60.8 years; range, 43–80 years) with surgically proven hilar cholangiocarcinoma or common bile duct (CBD) cancer who had undergone preoperative 2D and 3D MRCP with gadolinium-enhanced MRI and triple-phase MDCT with direct cholangiography (ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography) were included in this retrospective study. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed the two image sets. These readers evaluated the longitudinal extent of the tumor for involvement of the secondary confluence of both intrahepatic ducts and the intrapancreatic CBD, vascular involvement of the tumor, lymph node metastasis, and tumor resectability. The radiologists' performance was evaluated by calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. Correlation was made with the resected specimens or findings at surgical exploration.

RESULTS. For each reviewer, the overall accuracy rates for predicting involvement of the bilateral secondary biliary confluences and the intrapancreatic CBD were 90.7% and 87.0% for MRI with MRCP and 85.1% and 87.0% for MDCT with direct cholangiography. The differences were not statistically significant for either image set for either reviewer (p > 0.05). In the assessment of vascular involvement, lymph node metastasis, and tumor resectability, the readers' diagnostic performance using MRI with MRCP was similar to that with MDCT with direct cholangiography (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION. In the diagnosis of bile duct cancer with a noninvasive procedure, the information regarding tumor extent and resectability obtained with contrast-enhanced MRI combined with MRCP is comparable with that obtained with MDCT with direct cholangiography.

Keywords: bile duct neoplasm • MDCT • MR cholangiopancreatography • MRI


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. E. Chung, M.-J. Kim, Y. N. Park, J.-Y. Choi, J. Y. Pyo, Y. C. Kim, H. J. Cho, K. A. Kim, and S. Y. Choi
Varying Appearances of Cholangiocarcinoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation1
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 683 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-Y. Choi, M.-J. Kim, J. M. Lee, K. W. Kim, J. Y. Lee, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Role of Preoperative Imaging with Sonography, MDCT, MRI, and Direct Cholangiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1448 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.