AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Honnef, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mahnken, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Honnef, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mahnken, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3057
AJR 2008; 190:467-473
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Original Research

Prospective Evaluation of Image Quality with Use of a Patient Image Gallery for Dose Reduction in Pediatric 16-MDCT

Dagmar Honnef1, Joachim E. Wildberger1, Gabriel Haras2, Christian Hohl1, Gundula Staatz3, Rolf W. Günther1 and Andreas H. Mahnken1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
2 Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany.
3 Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to evaluate prospective adjustment of dose settings in pediatric 16-MDCT by use of computer-simulated images in a patient image gallery and to compare the dose reduction achieved with that of standard pediatric protocols.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The image gallery consisted of images from weight-dependent sample examinations performed with varied simulated tube current–exposure time settings. The scanning parameters prospectively chosen on the basis of the image quality of the image gallery were used for 30 16-MDCT examinations (chest, n = 15; abdomen, n = 8; pelvis, n = 7) of 22 children (14 boys, eight girls; mean age, 6.8 ± 5.8 years; mean body weight, 26.7 ± 19.6 kg). Three blinded radiologists used a 4-point grading scale to rate the overall image quality of the image gallery and the 16-MDCT scans. Objective and subjective image quality was assessed for the simulated and actual CT scans. The concordance correlation coefficient (K) was determined.

RESULTS. There was mainly moderate concordance with regard to objective (chest, K = 0.69; abdomen, K = 0.33; pelvis, K = 0.55) and subjective (chest soft-tissue window, kappa coefficient [{kappa}] = 0.00; chest lung window, {kappa} = 0.53; abdomen, {kappa} = 1.00; pelvis, {kappa} = 0.48) analysis of image gallery compared with actual 16-MDCT examinations. Compared with use of previous weight-adapted pediatric standard protocols, use of an image gallery resulted in further dose reduction for abdominal and pelvic CT but not for thoracic CT.

CONCLUSION. A patient image gallery can be used as a basis for pediatric 16-MDCT examinations. The gallery provides a preexamination overview of expected image quality. Radiation exposure can be optimized with regard to patient weight and the image quality needed to answer the clinical question.

Keywords: dose • image quality • MDCT • pediatric


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.