AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shin, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gong, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shin, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gong, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2664
AJR 2008; 190:630-636
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Papillary Lesions of the Breast Diagnosed at Percutaneous Sonographically Guided Biopsy: Comparison of Sonographic Features and Biopsy Methods

Hee Jung Shin1, Hak Hee Kim1, Sun Mi Kim1, Hye Rin Yang1, Jeong-Hee Sohn1, Gui Young Kwon2 and Gyungyub Gong2

1 Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-Dong, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 138-376, South Korea.
2 Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to retrospectively assess the potential role of sonographic features and biopsy in the management of patients with papillary lesions diagnosed at percutaneous sonographically guided biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Surgical or sonographic follow-up (≥ 2 years) was available in 123 women (age range, 21–75 years; mean age, 47 years) with 124 papillary lesions diagnosed at sonographically guided core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy during a 7-year period. Surgical excision results or follow-up sonograms with no change at the 2-year follow-up served as the reference standard. We reviewed the sonographic features, biopsy results, and surgical or sonographic follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher's exact test for the difference of sonographic features.

RESULTS. Cancer incidence per BI-RADS category was as follows: category 3, zero (0%) of 21; category 4a, 14 (17%) of 85; category 4b, four (36%) of 11; category 4c, one (20%) of five; and category 5, one (50%) of two. On sonography, two features distinguishing benign from malignant papillary lesions were echo pattern and margins of masses. Core needle biopsy gave a sensitivity of 28% and specificity of 100%, whereas both sensitivity and specificity were 100% with vacuum-assisted biopsy. Of 117 lesions with benign biopsy results, upgrade to malignancy or high-risk lesion was found in 17% of benign papillomas, 24% of atypical papillomas, and 0% of multiple papillomas.

CONCLUSION. Vacuum-assisted biopsy was more accurate than core needle biopsy in diagnosing papillary lesions, and both sonographic features and core needle biopsy were not sufficiently accurate. Therefore, surgical excision should be performed for the accurate diagnosis of papillary lesions.

Keywords: breast • breast biopsy • breast cancer • papillary lesion • sonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.