AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ha, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ha, H. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2156
AJR 2008; 190:698-706
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Automated Carbon Dioxide Insufflation for CT Colonography: Effectiveness of Colonic Distention in Cancer Patients with Severe Luminal Narrowing

So Yeon Kim1, Seong Ho Park1, Eugene K. Choi2, Seung Soo Lee1, Kyoung Ho Lee3, Jin Cheon Kim1, Chang Sik Yu1, Hee Cheol Kim1, Ah Young Kim1 and Hyun Kwon Ha1

1 Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Poongnap-Dong, Songpa-Gu, 138-040 Seoul, Korea.
2 Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY.
3 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Korea.

OBJECTIVE.The objective of our study was to determine the effectiveness of automated CO2 insufflation in colonic distention for CT colonography (CTC) in patients with severe luminal narrowing by colorectal cancer and preliminarily evaluate its safety performed shortly after colonoscopic polypectomy or biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS.Seventy-four patients were examined with colonos-copy and subsequent CTC (time interval, 0–8 days) using automated CO2 insufflation. Thirty-six patients whose colonoscopy was incomplete due to severe luminal narrowing by cancer that prevented colonoscope passage constituted the stenotic group. The remaining 38 patients constituted the nonstenotic group. Colonic distention was graded by two experienced readers from 1 (worst) to 4 (best) and compared between the two groups. Clinical data and CT images were analyzed for the occurrence of colonic perforation.

RESULTS.Distention was not significantly different between the stenotic and nonstenotic groups in any colonic segments in both supine and prone positions. The mean distention grade ± SD of the colonic segments proximal to the luminal narrowing in the stenotic group (n = 143 segments) was 3.7 ± 0.7 and 3.8 ± 0.7 for the supine and prone positions, respectively. Colonic perforation was not noted in any of the 74 patients, including 65 patients who underwent CTC within 24 hours after colonoscopy (62 snare polypectomies, two polypectomies using biopsy forceps, 63 routine mucosal biopsies).

CONCLUSION.Automated pressure-controlled CO2 insufflation is as efficient in colonic distention for CTC in colorectal cancer patients with severe luminal narrowing as it is in patients without severe luminal narrowing.

Keywords: automated insufflation • colorectal cancer • CT colonography • distention • safety • virtual colonoscopy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.