AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torshizy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Resnick, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torshizy, H.
Right arrow Articles by Resnick, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2967
AJR 2008; 190:W175-W181
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Anatomic Features of Metatarsal Heads That Simulate Erosive Disease: Cadaveric Study Using CT, Radiography, and Dissection with Special Emphasis on Cross-Sectional Characterization of Osseous Anatomy

Hamid Torshizy1,2, Tudor H. Hughes1, Debra Trudell1,2 and Donald Resnick1,2

1 Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., Mail Code 114, San Diego, CA 92161.
2 Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to characterize and describe normal osseous contours of the metatarsal heads that may simulate erosive changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. CT of the metatarsal heads was performed in six human cadaveric feet, and 3D reformatted images were analyzed. Subsequently, five feet were sectioned in planes corresponding to those at imaging for anatomic correlation, and one foot was anatomically dissected for correlation. The normal anatomic osseous contours of the metatarsal heads were analyzed and described.

RESULTS. Normal osseous anatomy of the greater (first) and lesser (second through fifth) metatarsal heads was identified. The normal osseous landmarks that simulate erosive changes were identified. Variations in the normal anatomic osseous contours, including those related to the medial and lateral condyles, were present in all specimens. The lateral condyle of the first metatarsal head was found to be more prominent than the medial condyle. In addition, anatomic variations in the normal osseous concavities of the lateral and medial aspects of each metatarsal head were measured. An intersesamoidal ridge, present on the plantar surface of the first metatarsal head, was identified in all specimens.

CONCLUSION. The normal anatomic contours of the metatarsal head are a potential major source for diagnostic error when viewing sectional CT and MR images in patients with suspected erosive arthritis. These normal variations, although common and varied, produce characteristic findings that can be differentiated from bone erosions.

Keywords: anatomy • ankle • arthritis • foot • metatarsal head • musculoskeletal imaging


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.