HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herzog, C. Articles by Schoepf, U. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Herzog, C. Articles by Schoepf, U. J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Pediatric Cardiovascular CT Angiography: Radiation Dose Reduction Using Automatic Anatomic Tube Current Modulation

¹ Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 169 Ashley Ave., Charleston, SC 29425.
² Department of Radiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
³ Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of weight-based scanning protocols and automatic tube current modulation on the tube current–time product and image quality at pediatric cardiovascular 64-MDCT angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Our pediatric cardiovascular 64-MDCT protocols use a weight-based algorithm to determine nominal tube voltage settings with 80, 100, and 120 kV. Automatic tube current modulation was used for each case. The mAs, volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol), and dose–length product (DLP) values were recorded and the effective dose calculated. On the basis of the selected nominal tube current, the dose values that would have been delivered without tube current modulation were also calculated. Scans were compared with 16-MDCT using 120 kVp and 120 mAs. Two radiologists independently rated image quality on a 5-point scale. Image noise was objectively measured within four different regions of interest. Findings at CT were clinically correlated with results of cardiac sonography, angiography, or surgery.

RESULTS. Thirty-eight 64-MDCT and 30 16-MDCT scans were evaluated. Mean diagnostic quality for 64-MDCT was rated at 3.6 ± 0.4 and mean image noise was 8.9 ± 4.5 H. Results with 16-MDCT were not significantly different: diagnostic quality (3.6 ± 0.4; p = 0.97) and image noise (9.1 ± 2.8 H; p = 0.31). Scanning with automatic tube current modulation significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the tube current time–product compared with scanning without automatic tube current modulation (–57.8% / 54.1 / 128 mAs) or with 16-MDCT (–47.9% / 54.1 / 104.37 mAs), respectively. The mAs values were significantly (p < 0.05) lower for 80 kVp than for 100 or 120 kVp scans, but image quality and image noise were not significantly (p = 0.24) different. Agreement between MDCT and clinical findings was excellent.

CONCLUSION. Under simulated conditions, automatic tube current modulation combined with low tube voltage settings significantly reduced radiation exposure and thus appears preferable in pediatric cardiovascular 64-MDCT.

Keywords: congenital abnormalities of the chest • CT image quality • CT in infants and children • CT radiation exposure • CT technology

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?