AJR ARRS PQI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plumhans, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mahnken, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plumhans, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mahnken, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3022
AJR 2008; 190:1358-1361
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Assessment of Global Right Ventricular Function on 64-MDCT Compared with MRI

Cédric Plumhans1, Georg Mühlenbruch1, Annuar Rapaee2, Kui-Hian Sim2, Tobias Seyfarth3, Rolf W. Günther1 and Andreas H. Mahnken1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraβe 30, D 52057 Aachen, Germany.
2 Department of Cardiology, Sarawak General Hospital, Sarawak, Malaysia.
3 Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to compare ECG-gated 64-MDCT with MRI for the assessment of global right ventricular (RV) function from coronary CT angiography data.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-eight patients (25 men, 13 women; mean age ± SD, 55.0 ± 8.8 years) with suspected coronary artery disease underwent contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT (64 x 0.6 mm, 120 kV, 770 mAseff) and 1.5-T MRI (balanced fast-field echo; TR/TE, 3.3/1.6; flip angle, 60°; 50 phases). Double oblique short-axis MDCT and MR images were used for further analysis. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) were computed from manually drawn endocardial contours of the right ventricle. For statistical analysis, repeated-measures analysis of variance and Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated. Bland-Altman plots were computed.

RESULTS. In general, RV volumes calculated from 64-MDCT agreed well with those calculated from MRI. The mean EF (± SD) calculated from MDCT and MRI was 51.0% ± 7.8% and 51.4% ± 7.3%, respectively. An excellent correlation was observed for EDV (r = 0.99), ESV (r = 0.98), SV (r = 0.98), and EF (r = 0.97). Bland-Altman plots showed no systematic variation between MDCT and MRI data. No statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between the techniques were found.

CONCLUSION. Although contrast injection is optimized for visualization of the coronary arteries, retrospectively ECG-gated 64-MDCT permits reliable assessment of global RV function.

Keywords: cardiac imaging • heart disease • MDCT • MRI • right ventricular function


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y.-K. Guo, Z.-G. Yang, G. Ning, L. Rao, L. Dong, Y. Pen, T.-M. Zhang, Y. Wu, X.-C. Zhang, and Q.-L. Wang
Isolated Mitral Regurgitation: Quantitative Assessment with 64-Section Multidetector CT--Comparison with MR Imaging and Echocardiography
Radiology, May 18, 2009; (2009) 2522081714.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Sundaram, S. Patel, P. Agarwal, and E. A. Kazerooni
Anatomy and Terminology for the Interpretation and Reporting of Cardiac MDCT: Part 2, CT Angiography, Cardiac Function Assessment, and Noncoronary and Extracardiac Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 584 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.