HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Muhogora, W. E. Articles by Shandorf, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Muhogora, W. E. Articles by Shandorf, C. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Patient Doses in Radiographic Examinations in 12 Countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: Initial Results from IAEA Projects

¹ Tanzania Atomic Energy Commission, Arusha, Tanzania.
² Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, Khartoum, Sudan.
³ King Abdul Aziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
⁴ Dubai Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
⁵ University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
⁶ Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia.
⁷ Centre Régional d'Études Nucléaires de Kinshasa (CREN-K), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
⁸ Chulalongkorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
⁹ Clinical Centre Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
¹⁰ Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Department, Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals, Harare, Zimbabwe.
¹¹ Institut National des Sciences et Techniques Nucléaires, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
¹² International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, A-1400, Vienna, Austria.
¹³ Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
¹⁴ Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra, Ghana.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to survey image quality and the entrance surface air kerma for patients in radiographic examinations and to perform comparisons with diagnostic reference levels.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In this multinational prospective study, image quality and patient radiation doses were surveyed in 12 countries in Africa, Asia, and Eastern Europe, covering 45 hospitals. The rate of unsatisfactory images and image quality grade were noted, and causes for poor image quality were investigated. The entrance surface doses for adult patients were determined in terms of the entrance surface air kerma on the basis of X-ray tube output measurements and X-ray exposure parameters. Comparison of dose levels with diagnostic reference levels was performed.

RESULTS. The fraction of images rated as poor was as high as 53%. The image quality improved up to 16 percentage points in Africa, 13 in Asia, and 22 in Eastern Europe after implementation of a quality control (QC) program. Patient doses varied by a factor of up to 88, although the majority of doses were below diagnostic reference levels. The mean entrance surface air kerma values in mGy were 0.33 (chest, posteroanterior), 4.07 (lumbar spine, anteroposterior), 8.53 (lumbar spine, lateral), 3.64 (abdomen, anteroposterior), 3.68 (pelvis, anteroposterior), and 2.41 (skull, anteroposterior). Patient doses were found to be similar to doses in developed countries and patient dose reductions ranging from 1.4% to 85% were achieved.

CONCLUSION. Poor image quality constitutes a major source of unnecessary radiation to patients in developing countries. Comparison with other surveys indicates that patient dose levels in these countries are not higher than those in developed countries.

Keywords: patient doses • quality assurance • radiation protection • radiation safety • radiography

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Rehani THE IAEA'S ACTIVITIES IN RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION IN DIGITAL IMAGING Radiat Prot Dosimetry, June 3, 2008; (2008) ncn155v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]