AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perez-Rossello, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perez-Rossello, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, P. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3251
AJR 2008; 190:1481-1486
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Observations

Pubic Ramus Radiolucencies in Infants: The Good, the Bad, and the Indeterminate

Jeannette M. Perez-Rossello1, Susan A. Connolly1,2, Alice W. Newton1,2, Michael Thomason3, Carole Jenny4, Naomi F. Sugar5 and Paul K. Kleinman1

1 Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston MA 02115.
2 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA.
3 Department of Radiology Services, Greenville Memorial Medical Center, Greenville SC.
4 Child Protection Program, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence RI.
5 Department of Pediatrics, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle WA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to examine imaging findings that differentiate inflicted injuries from developmental variants of the superior pubic ramus in healthy and abused infants.

CONCLUSION. A superior pubic ramus fracture and a developmental variant can be difficult to differentiate radiographically. A smoothly marginated vertical radiolucency of the superior pubic ramus detected without other features suggesting infant abuse should not be interpreted as a fracture.

Keywords: child abuse • fractures • infants • pelvis • pubic bone


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.