AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leschka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alkadhi, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leschka, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alkadhi, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2000
AJR 2008; 190:1583-1590
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Effect of Decrease in Heart Rate Variability on the Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography

Sebastian Leschka1, Hans Scheffel1, Lars Husmann2, Oliver Gämperli2, Borut Marincek1, Philipp A. Kaufmann2,3 and Hatem Alkadhi1

1 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Medical Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
2 Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
3 Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT in the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. CT and invasive coronary angiography were performed on 114 patients (mean age, 62 years) referred for known coronary artery disease (n = 26), atypical chest pain (n = 58), and presurgical exclusion of coronary artery disease before abdominal aortic (n = 14) or cardiac valve (n = 16) surgery. The population was divided into two groups depending on median average heart rate (60.0 beats/min) and median heart rate variability (2.7 beats/min) during scanning. Heart rate variability was calculated as SD from the mean heart rate. Two blinded observers using a 4-point scale independently assessed the quality of images of each coronary artery segment and classified each segment as being stenosed (luminal diameter narrowing > 50%) or not. Invasive coronary angiography was used as the reference standard.

RESULTS. In 71 (62.3%) of the patients, 241 significant coronary artery stenoses were identified with invasive coronary angiography. In 11 (9.7%) of the patients, 1.6% (26/1,672) of the segments were not evaluable with CT. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in a patient-based analysis were 97%, 81%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. Image quality was better (p < 0.05) in the low average heart rate group than in the high average heart rate group, but diagnostic accuracy was comparable for the two groups. In contrast, image quality and diagnostic accuracy were significantly better (p < 0.01) among patients in the low heart rate variability group than in the high heart rate variability group.

CONCLUSION. Lower heart rate variability is associated with higher diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography.

Keywords: 64-MDCT • coronary angiography • coronary artery disease • heart rate


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.