AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walden, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vidal, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walden, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vidal, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.2796
AJR 2008; 190:1611-1615
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Incidental Enchondromas of the Knee

Michael J. Walden1, Mark D. Murphey1,2,3 and Jorge A. Vidal1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20306.
2 Department of Radiologic Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 6825 16th St. NW, Bldg. 54, Washington, DC 20306.
3 Department of Radiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of incidental enchondromas on routine MR knee imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed 449 consecutive routine knee MR examinations for the presence of enchondromas. MRI was considered positive when a focal geographic area of lobular marrow replacement (nonsubchondral) was identified on T1 weighting and high signal intensity was seen on T2 weighting. Patients with enchondromas were further evaluated for demographics; lesion site, size, and relationship to the physeal plate; aggressive imaging features described with chondrosarcoma; concurrent internal derangement; and study indication.

RESULTS. The prevalence of incidental enchondromas was 2.9% on routine knee MR examinations. The prevalence was highest in the distal femur (2.0%), followed by the proximal tibia (0.7%) and the proximal fibula (0.2%). The average lesion size was 1.9 x 1.2 x 1.3 cm (57% of lesions were < 1 cm). Most lesions were located in the metaphysis (71%) or diaphysis (21%). Enchondromas were within 1.5 cm of the physeal plate in 72% of cases. No aggressive imaging features to suggest chondrosarcoma were seen. All patients had evidence of internal derangement as the cause of symptoms and the request for imaging.

CONCLUSION. Incidental enchondromas can be identified on 2.9% of routine MR knee examinations, most frequently in the distal femur (2.0%). This significant prevalence is much higher than in an autopsy series (0.2%), likely reflecting the increased sensitivity of MRI for detecting small lesions, and is important to recognize to avoid confusion with other pathologic entities.

Keywords: appendicular musculoskeletal system • biomedical statistics • enchondromas • MRI • radiologic-pathologic correlation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.