AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitajima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sugimura, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitajima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sugimura, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3372
AJR 2008; 190:1652-1658
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Research

Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Endometrial Cancer

Kazuhiro Kitajima1,2,3, Koji Murakami2, Erena Yamasaki2, Ichio Fukasawa4, Noriyuki Inaba4, Yasushi Kaji1 and Kazuro Sugimura3

1 Department of Radiology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, 880 Kita-kobayashi, Mibu, Shimotuka-gun, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan.
2 PET Center, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Mibu, Japan.
3 Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Mibu, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of integrated PET and CT (PET/CT) using 18F-FDG in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer, using surgical and histopathologic findings as the reference standard.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty patients with clinical stages IA to IIIC underwent radical hysterectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without paraaortic lymphadenectomy, after FDG PET/CT. Lymphadenectomy involved removing all visible lymph nodes in the surgical fields. PET/CT findings were interpreted by two experienced radiologists in consensus and compared with histopathologic results. The criterion for malignancy on PET/CT images was increased radiotracer uptake by a lymph node independent of node size.

RESULTS. In total, 62 pathologically positive nodes were found in 10 patients and 60 of 62 dissected metastatic nodes were identified on the CT component. The overall node-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases were 53.3% (32/60), 99.6% (1,419/1,424), and 97.8% (1,451/1,484), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting metastatic lesions 4 mm or less in diameter was 16.7% (4/24), that for lesions between 5 and 9 mm was 66.7% (14/21), and that for lesions 10 mm or larger was 93.3% (14/15). The overall patient-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 50% (5/10), 86.7% (26/30), and 77.5% (31/40), respectively.

CONCLUSION. Integrated FDG PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging techniques, but it is only moderately sensitive in predicting lymph node metastasis preoperatively in patients with endometrial cancer. Even PET/CT should not replace lymphadenectomy.

Keywords: endometrial cancer • FDG PET/CT • lymph node metastasis • oncologic imaging • PET/CT • women's imaging


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. J. McMahon, N. M. Rofsky, and I. Pedrosa
Lymphatic Metastases from Pelvic Tumors: Anatomic Classification, Characterization, and Staging
Radiology, January 1, 2010; 254(1): 31 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. I. Lee and A. H. Russell
Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Endometrial Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): W210 - W210.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.